2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-assessing a test with a possible bonus enhances low performers’ academic performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, some authors doubt the effectiveness of these tools and state that students with a lack of motivation could negatively interfere in the assessment process [35,36]. In this way, the authors share the statement pointed out by Yuan et al [37] regarding the idea that the impact of the self-assessment mainly depends on the effectiveness of the self-assessment feedback. Finally, students highly supported (4.5/5) that lecturers ask them their opinions about the activity (Q22), since students perform a crucial role in the learning process and their opinions are required.…”
Section: Likert Analysismentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, some authors doubt the effectiveness of these tools and state that students with a lack of motivation could negatively interfere in the assessment process [35,36]. In this way, the authors share the statement pointed out by Yuan et al [37] regarding the idea that the impact of the self-assessment mainly depends on the effectiveness of the self-assessment feedback. Finally, students highly supported (4.5/5) that lecturers ask them their opinions about the activity (Q22), since students perform a crucial role in the learning process and their opinions are required.…”
Section: Likert Analysismentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The contribution of students could lead to updates to the lecture notes through a pull request. Although having a student's name appearing on the course's GitHub repository may itself be rewarding, ways to incorporate such contributions as a bonus grade might be investigated—a process that was shown to be effective especially for poorly performing students (Schultz, Anderson, & Seo‐Zindy, 2013; Yuan, Savadatti, & Zheng, 2021). There was lack of research evidence on adjusting the different aspects of the proposed typology, and that the research was applied on a cohort that consisted of a relatively small number of students.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has shown that self-assessment allows students to reflect on their past learning, identify strengths and areas for improvement, set learning expectations, and engage in relevant activities to narrow the gap between the current and desired proficiency level (Belgrad, 2013; Cox & Dewey, 2021; Zimmerman & Schunk, 2001). Also, self-assessment, as “feedback for oneself from oneself” (Andrade & Du, 2007, p. 160), encourages students’ proactive interaction with the feedback from external measures, making them more aware of what their problems are, what to do next, and what learning strategies to adopt (Yuan et al, 2021).…”
Section: A Model Of Integrating National Standards In Local Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%