1985
DOI: 10.1021/je00040a002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-diffusion in compressed supercritical toluene-d8

Abstract: The self-diffusion coefficients of supercritical toluene-d, were measured by using the NMR spin-echo technique for temperatures from 300 to 450 °C at constant pressures of 100, 500, and 1000 bar. The results at 100 bar are compared to the predictions for toluene diffusion by using various empirical correlation methods for estimation of the diffusion coefficients In the supercritical region.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We next attempted to use the same values of β and γ given above to predict self-diffusion coefficients and data on diffusion in supercritical carbon dioxide, the solvent that is used most extensively. Figure 5 shows our predictions of the data available on the self-diffusion coefficients of carbon dioxide (Chen, 1983;Takahashi and Hiroji, 1966), ethylene (Arends et al, 1981;Baker et al, 1984), toluene (Baker et al, 1985), and chlorotrifluoromethane (Harris, 1978). The predictions, with no parameters adjusted from the data, are excellent, with an average absolute error of 3.64%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We next attempted to use the same values of β and γ given above to predict self-diffusion coefficients and data on diffusion in supercritical carbon dioxide, the solvent that is used most extensively. Figure 5 shows our predictions of the data available on the self-diffusion coefficients of carbon dioxide (Chen, 1983;Takahashi and Hiroji, 1966), ethylene (Arends et al, 1981;Baker et al, 1984), toluene (Baker et al, 1985), and chlorotrifluoromethane (Harris, 1978). The predictions, with no parameters adjusted from the data, are excellent, with an average absolute error of 3.64%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%