Self‐harm and substance use in a community sample of Black and White women with binge eating disorder or bulimia nervosa

Dohm, Faith-Anne; Striegel‐Moore, Ruth H.; Wilfley, Denise E.; Pike, Kathleen M.; Hook, Julie M.; Fairburn, Christopher G.

doi:10.1002/eat.10104

Cited by 47 publications

(36 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…countries (Garner et al 1985;Yellowlees, 1985;Mitchell et al 1986;Gleaves & Eberenz, 1993;Pryor et al 1996;Tobin & Griffing, 1996;Wiederman & Pryor, 1996a, b;Favaro & Santonastaso, 1997, 1998Nagata et al 2000a;Steiger et al 2001;Anderson et al 2002;Dohm et al 2002;Paul et al 2002;Stein et al 2004;Ruuska et al 2005;Corstorphine et al 2007;Ahren-Moonga et al 2008;Bulik et al 2008;Fichter et al 2008;Muehlenkamp et al 2009;Liang & Meg Tseng, 2011;Peebles et al 2011;Iannaccone et al 2013;Vansteelandt et al 2013;Bueno et al 2014). The 29th publication (Solano et al 2005) shared participants with the sample in Bueno et al (2014).…”

Section: Search Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Lifetime prevalence of non-suicidal self-injury in patients with eating disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. Against a backdrop of increasing research, clinical and taxonomic attention in non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), evidence suggests a link between NSSI and eating disorders (ED). The frequency estimates of NSSI in ED vary widely. Little is known about the sources of this variation, and no meta-analysis has quantified the association between ED and NSSI.Method. Using random-effects meta-analyses, meta-regression analyses, and 1816-6466 unique participants with various ED, we estimated the weighted average percentage of individuals with ED, those with anorexia nervosa (AN) and those with bulimia nervosa (BN) who are reported to have a lifetime history of NSSI across studies. We further examined predictors of NSSI in ED.Results. The weighted average percentage of patients with a lifetime history of NSSI was 27.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 23.8-31.0%] for ED, 21.8% (95% CI 18.5-25.6%) for AN, and 32.7% (95% CI 26.9-39.1%) for BN. The difference between BN and AN was statistically significant [odds ratio (OR) 1.77, 95% CI 1.14-2.77, p = 0.013]. The odds of NSSI increased by 24% for every 10% increase in the percentage of participants with histories of suicide attempts (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.04-1.48, p = 0.020) and decreased by 26% for every 10% increase in the percentage of participants with histories of substance abuse (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58-0.95, p = 0.023).Conclusions. In the specific context of ED, NSSI is highly prevalent and correlates positively with attempted suicide, urging for NSSI-focused treatments. A novel finding is that NSSI is potentially antagonized by substance abuse.

show abstract

Section: Search Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Lifetime prevalence of non-suicidal self-injury in patients with eating disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…55,75,78,82,83 This suggests that weight and shape overconcern may be sufficiently elevated to be considered as a diagnostic criterion for BED as it is for BN. Even though BED does not currently have a cognitive criterion concerning shape and weight concern, future versions of the DSM (e.g., DSM-V) could consider stipulating that self-evaluation is unduly influenced by body shape and weight in BED.…”

Section: Distinguishing Bed From Bnmentioning

confidence: 99%

The diagnostic validity of the criteria for binge eating disorder

Latner

Clyne

2007

Intl J Eating Disorders

113

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: This paper considers whether the criteria currently used to classify the diagnosis of binge eating disorder (BED) are valid and appropriate.Method: We review evidence that reflects on the validity of the current criteria for binge eating episodes and BED, using literature retrieved through major psychology and psychiatry search engines (e.g., PsycInfo, PubMed).Results: Evidence from experimental research points to the relative importance of episode frequency, the amount of food consumed at episodes, the subjective sense of loss of control over eating, and several additional criteria associated with binge episodes in BED. Evidence on the differences in psychopathology between BED and bulimia nervosa and between BED and obesity without binge eating, as related to diagnostic criteria, is reviewed. Binge eating disorder (BED) is highly prevalent among individuals seeking treatment for obesity, with prevalence estimates ranging between 15 and 50%. In the general population, the lifetime prevalence of BED is between 0.7% and 4%. Conclusion1 BED is defined in the fourth edition (text revision) of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV-TR) as frequent binge eating episodes, characterized by the consumption of a large quantity of food in a discrete period of time, accompanied by a subjective sense of loss of control over eating. Individuals with BED must also experience distress about their binge eating, and binge episodes are associated with at least three of the following: eating more rapidly than normal, eating until uncomfortably full, eating large amounts when not hungry, eating alone because of embarrassment, and feeling disgusted, depressed, or guilty about overeating. 1 BED, as it is currently defined, is associated not only with eating disorder psychopathology, but also with comorbid psychiatric disorders, health problems, and obesity.2 Health-related quality of life is significantly impaired in obese women with BED relative to obese women without BED.3,4 For these reasons, it has been argued that BED is a distinct and significant disorder of clinical severity that requires specific treatment.5 However, it has also been proposed that the frequent psychiatric comorbidity, good response to many forms of treatment, and the lack of agreement on what constitutes a large amount of food make the BED diagnosis more useful as a marker for other psychopathology in obese individuals than as a clinical disorder in its own right. 6 Another potential problem with the diagnostic definition of BED lies in the question of whether the criteria for the disorder are valid. Kendell and Jablensky 7 have suggested that validity in psychiatric disorders is present if the defining characteristics of a syndrome can be demonstrated to be an entity, separated clearly from neighboring syndromes and from normality. This article examines the evidence regarding the DSM-IV criteria for BED. The diagnostic criteria have two major components: the definition of a binge episode, and BED-specific criteria. This review first...

show abstract

“…For example, high rates of co-morbidity between NSSI and substance use are commonly reported (Putnins, 1995;Beutrais et al, 1996;Kessler et al, 1999;Hilt et al, 2008), although not invariably found (Dulit et al, 1994;Soloff et al, 1994). There is also a well-documented link between NSSI and eating disorders (Favazza et al, 1989;Favaro and Santonastaso, 2000;Wonderlich, 2001;Dohm, 2002;Paul, 2002;Sansone and Levitt, 2002;Stein et al, 2004; but see also Zlotnick et al, 1999). Rates of self-injury are also elevated six-fold in people who have been exposed to physical acts of violence or threats to their lives (Berenson et al, 2001).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Direct and indirect forms of non-suicidal self-injury: Evidence for a distinction

Germain

Hooley

2012

Psychiatry Research

119

116

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) involves deliberate acts (such as cutting) that directly damage the body but occur without suicidal intent. However, other non-suicidal behaviors that involve people mistreating or abusing themselves but that do not deliberately and directly damage bodily tissue may have much in common with NSSI. Such 'indirect' methods of self-injury might include involvement in abusive relationships, substance abuse, risky or reckless behavior, or eating disordered behavior. Using a community sample (N=156) we compared individuals engaging in NSSI (n=50), indirect (non-suicidal) self-injurers (n=38), and healthy controls (n=68) on a range of clinical and personality characteristics. As predicted, non-suicidal selfinjurers and indirect self-injurers showed more pathology than healthy controls on all measures.Comparisons of the NSSI and the Indirect self-injury groups revealed no significant differences on measures of dissociation, aggression, impulsivity, self-esteem, negative temperament, depressive symptoms, and borderline personality disorder. However, compared to people who engaged only in indirect forms of self-injury, those who engaged in NSSI were more self-critical, had higher scores on a measure of suicide proneness, and had a history of more suicide attempts.The findings suggest that NSSI and indirect self-injury are best viewed as separate and distinct clinical phenomena.Key Words = DSM-5, non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), deliberate self-harm, suicide, borderline personality disorder, self-criticism.NSSI and Indirect Self--Injury 3 3

show abstract

Self‐harm and substance use in a community sample of Black and White women with binge eating disorder or bulimia nervosa

Cited by 47 publications

References 24 publications

Lifetime prevalence of non-suicidal self-injury in patients with eating disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Lifetime prevalence of non-suicidal self-injury in patients with eating disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The diagnostic validity of the criteria for binge eating disorder

Direct and indirect forms of non-suicidal self-injury: Evidence for a distinction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About