2005
DOI: 10.1007/11575863_119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-tuning Personalized Information Retrieval in an Ontology-Based Framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…query length), the search space, the result set, or other domain-specific factors. Also, we are currently exploring techniques where the coefficients in the linear combination are a function of application-specific variables of the ranking system, such as the uncertainty in the rankings [1].…”
Section: Further Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…query length), the search space, the result set, or other domain-specific factors. Also, we are currently exploring techniques where the coefficients in the linear combination are a function of application-specific variables of the ranking system, such as the uncertainty in the rankings [1].…”
Section: Further Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To name a few examples, rank aggregation takes place in the combination of multiple criteria for document/query similarity assessment in most search engines; in merging the outputs of different engines for meta-search; in the combination of query-based and preference-based relevance for personalized search [1]; or even in the combination of preferences from multiple users for collaborative retrieval [5]. Both rank-based and score-based aggregation techniques have been explored in prior research on this topic [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data handled by these techniques have been rather low-level and simple: document IDs, text keywords and topic categories at most (Jeh & Widom, 2003;Micarelli & Sciarrone, 2004). The recent proposals and achievements towards the enrichment of multimedia content by formal, ontology-based, semantic descriptions open new opportunities for improvement in the personalisation field from a new, richer representational level (Bloehdorn et al, 2005;Castells et al, 2005). We see the introduction of ontology-based technology in the area of personalisation as a promising research direction (Gauch, Chaffee & Preschner, 2003).…”
Section: Ontology-based Personalisation For Content Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an ontology-based approach, semantic user preferences may be represented as a vector of weights (numbers from -1 to 1), representing the intensity of the user interest for each concept, being negative values indicative of a dislike for that concept (Castells et al, 2005). Similarly, content is described by a set of weighted concepts (values from 0 to 1, indicating the intensity of relation between the content and the concept) in such a way that users can be related to the content units that make up the search space through the ontology layer (see Figure 1).…”
Section: Ontology-based Personalisation For Content Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation