2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SEM and ESEM techniques used for analysis of asphalt binder and mixture: A state of the art review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
50
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
3
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2c,d demonstrate that upon [Emim][TFSI] incorporation into the PLLA matrix, and independently of the drying temperature, the IL induced the occurrence of a significant roughness and porosity. This effect was reported previously for other polymeric matrices (e.g., poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) [27]), and was attributed to the strong [Emim][TFSI]-DCM interaction, phase separation within the polymer solutions and [Emim][TFSI] trapping within the pores, once the solvent is evaporated from the solvent+IL rich regions [28].…”
Section: Morphologysupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Figure 2c,d demonstrate that upon [Emim][TFSI] incorporation into the PLLA matrix, and independently of the drying temperature, the IL induced the occurrence of a significant roughness and porosity. This effect was reported previously for other polymeric matrices (e.g., poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) [27]), and was attributed to the strong [Emim][TFSI]-DCM interaction, phase separation within the polymer solutions and [Emim][TFSI] trapping within the pores, once the solvent is evaporated from the solvent+IL rich regions [28].…”
Section: Morphologysupporting
confidence: 72%
“…SEM images can be used to provide information on the dispersion of the polymer-rich phase in the modified binder, to provide an understanding of the bitumen-polymer compatibility, to find the optimum polymer content, and to reveal the damage resulting from the aging process. In SEM images, the bitumen-rich phase appears dark or black, and the polymer-rich phase appears light [41].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No significant increase in the surface oxygen content was detected after ozone treatment (0.7 at.%). The penetration depth of an EDX electron beam is 1–20 µm (Mazumder et al., 2018) compared with 1–10 nm for XPS; thus, XPS provides more information closer to the surface (Bandosz and Ania, 2006; Haasch, 2014). XPS measurements showed that pristine graphite contained 4.1 ± 0.12 at% of surface-oxygen and that ozonation further increased this content to 5.9 ± 0.18 at%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%