2015
DOI: 10.11649/cs.2012.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic relations among adjectives in Polish WordNet 2.0: a new relation set, discussion and evaluation

Abstract: Semantic relations among adjectives in Polish WordNet 2.0: a new relation set, discussion and evaluationAdjectives in wordnets are often neglected: there are many fewer of them than nouns, and relations among them are sometimes not as varied as those among nouns or verbs. Polish WordNet 1.0 was no exception. Version 2.0 aims to correct that. We present an overview of a much larger set of lexical-semantic relations which connect adjectives to the other parts of the network. Our choice of relations has been moti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from Antonymy relation between adjective lexical units, they defined Hyponymy relation between adjective synsets (cf. Maziarz et al 2012). Thus, adjective domain in plWordNet has vertical structure, akin to that of nouns and verbs.…”
Section: Adjectives In Plwordnet and In Princeton Wordnetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Apart from Antonymy relation between adjective lexical units, they defined Hyponymy relation between adjective synsets (cf. Maziarz et al 2012). Thus, adjective domain in plWordNet has vertical structure, akin to that of nouns and verbs.…”
Section: Adjectives In Plwordnet and In Princeton Wordnetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is clearly the case of plWN and PWN adjective domain, which has vertical, hyponymy-based structure in plWN (akin to that of nouns and verbs) (cf. Maziarz et al 2012), and a horizontal, dumbbell model-based structure in PWN (cf. Miller 1998, Sheinman et al 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation