2014
DOI: 10.1111/cyt.12211_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-quantitative HPV viral load in patients with ASC-US cytology: viral load correlates strongly with the presence of CIN, but only weakly with its severity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…should be made. In our experience and in the article by Lee et al ., a significant correlation between increasing values of hrHPV load expressed as RLUs and the severity of CIN has been demonstrated in ASC‐US cases: this is the key point of the issue. Indeed, we reported a 71% prevalence of CIN2/CIN3 in cases with relative light units to cut‐off (RLU/CO) > 10, compared with 4% in cases with RLU/CO < 10 ( P = 0.001); moreover, we reported that only one case of CIN3 was detected in the latter subgroup.…”
supporting
confidence: 58%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…should be made. In our experience and in the article by Lee et al ., a significant correlation between increasing values of hrHPV load expressed as RLUs and the severity of CIN has been demonstrated in ASC‐US cases: this is the key point of the issue. Indeed, we reported a 71% prevalence of CIN2/CIN3 in cases with relative light units to cut‐off (RLU/CO) > 10, compared with 4% in cases with RLU/CO < 10 ( P = 0.001); moreover, we reported that only one case of CIN3 was detected in the latter subgroup.…”
supporting
confidence: 58%
“…Indeed, we reported a 71% prevalence of CIN2/CIN3 in cases with relative light units to cut‐off (RLU/CO) > 10, compared with 4% in cases with RLU/CO < 10 ( P = 0.001); moreover, we reported that only one case of CIN3 was detected in the latter subgroup. Consistently, Lee et al . reported a significant difference in terms of median RLU/CO values among negative, CIN1 and CIN2+ cases ( P < 0.001).…”
supporting
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations