Semiotic mode and sensory modality in multimodal semiotics: Recognizing difference and building complementarity between the terms

Abstract

This article addresses an issue in multimodal cultural studies – the inconsistent use of the notions ‘mode’ and ‘modality’. As these notions are frequently employed interchangeably, making a clear distinction between them and positioning them in a coherent system will be helpful. To outline such a system, I envisage a two-layer framework where modes and modalities support each other. The central branch of multimodal semiotics (developing from Gunther Kress’ sociosemiotics towards John Bateman’s comprehensive approach) recognizes ‘mode’ as a pivotal research concept. While ‘mode’ as a semiotic resource is dependent on its materiality, culturally shaped practices and discourse semantics, the neurocognitive characteristics of sensory modalities are often seen as secondary to meaning-making. This article suggests that discussion of the semiotic potential of sensory modalities is complementary to the semiotic theory of multimodality. In order to illustrate this, I will construct an experimental typology of modality relations, which also takes modes into account. This typology distinguishes between supporting, modifying, conflicting, substituting and cross-activating relations.

Refining concepts for empirical multimodal research: defining semiotic modes and semiotic resources

“…Due to the limitation in space, I have not been able to provide an adequate treatment of sensory channels in this paper. However, there is already some work in this direction (e.g.,Oja, 2023) and I am myself working on a contribution to this discussion.…”