2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-03056-8_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SemQuire - Assessing the Data Quality of Linked Open Data Sources Based on DQV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A major obstacle to the reuse of digitized cultural heritage as data and large repositories for AI is a lack in data quality (Mihindukulasooriya et al, 2018; Neudecker, 2022). Over the last few years, the research community has increasingly sought to evaluate the data quality of LOD repositories providing and describing the criteria used (Färber et al, 2018; Langer et al, 2018; Radulovic et al, 2018; Zaveri et al, 2016). Previous studies are based on the assessment of LOD provided by libraries using SPARQL and manual extraction of the data (Candela et al, 2022).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A major obstacle to the reuse of digitized cultural heritage as data and large repositories for AI is a lack in data quality (Mihindukulasooriya et al, 2018; Neudecker, 2022). Over the last few years, the research community has increasingly sought to evaluate the data quality of LOD repositories providing and describing the criteria used (Färber et al, 2018; Langer et al, 2018; Radulovic et al, 2018; Zaveri et al, 2016). Previous studies are based on the assessment of LOD provided by libraries using SPARQL and manual extraction of the data (Candela et al, 2022).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SELECT ?label ?wikidata WHERE { <http://de.dbpedia.org/resource/Aphrodite> rdfs:label ?label; owl:sameAs ?wikidata. FILTER(REGEX( str (?wikidata ), "www.wikidata.org")) } used (Färber et al, 2018;Langer et al, 2018;Radulovic et al, 2018;Zaveri et al, 2016). Previous studies are based on the assessment of LOD provided by libraries using SPARQL and manual extraction of the data (Candela et al, 2022).…”
Section: Data Quality Assessment and Reuse Of Ch Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Recently, mappings between traditional metadata formats and advanced controlled vocabularies have been published. 27 In addition, dedicated websites have been published to describe the classes and properties that can be used to describe the information as RDF. 28 Previous works have addressed the comparison of bibliographic models such as LRM and BIBFRAME.…”
Section: Reference Approach Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SemQuire consists of a quality assessment tool for analysing aspects of quality of particular LOD. It recommends a se-ries of 55 intrinsic, representational, contextual and accessibility quality metrics [34]. Stardog Integrity Constraint Validation (ICV) allows to write constraints that are translated to SPARQL in order to assess RDF triples in a repository [29].…”
Section: Validating Lodmentioning
confidence: 99%