1980
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.77.10.5693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sendai virus utilizes specific sialyloligosaccharides as host cell receptor determinants.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, the test system may not be sensitive enough to detect minor differences in receptor avidity. We postulated that such altered avidity can be revealed by the use of RBC partially depleted of cell surface receptors (5,16,24) and that the relationship between the degree of this depletion and the extent of HAD on the different HN-expressing cells would give a relative measure of receptor binding avidity. This modification would increase the sensitivity of the assay to differences in binding avidity.…”
Section: Infectivity Of Wt and Variant Viruses In The Presence Of 4-gmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, the test system may not be sensitive enough to detect minor differences in receptor avidity. We postulated that such altered avidity can be revealed by the use of RBC partially depleted of cell surface receptors (5,16,24) and that the relationship between the degree of this depletion and the extent of HAD on the different HN-expressing cells would give a relative measure of receptor binding avidity. This modification would increase the sensitivity of the assay to differences in binding avidity.…”
Section: Infectivity Of Wt and Variant Viruses In The Presence Of 4-gmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…precursor (Lamb & Kolakofsky, 1996) into the active F " and F # subunits (lane 12). Treatment of 3T3 cells with Vibrio cholerae sialidase, which hydrolyses endogenous cell surface sialoglycoconjugates (Markwell & Paulson, 1980), renders the cells resistant to VLPHN + infection (lane 10). Sialidase-treated 1-7-1 cells, by contrast, can still be infected by VLPHN + (lane 11) indicating that there is an alternative route of entry for the particles via ASGP-R.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was not surprising that the UV-SeV-pretreated T cells, from which the sialic acid residues had been dissociated, would be infected by SeV-EGFP during the culture periods, because it was assumed that the UV-SeV-pretreated T cells regained the specific receptor for SeV on T cells. 28 These findings suggest that the receptor of SeV might be expressed on the naive T cells.…”
Section: Entry Of the Sev Vector After Cell Surface Attachment Occumentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The following factors may have led to the observed difference in transduction efficiency between naive and activated T cells: (i) a difference in the expression of a specific receptor for SeV, 28 (ii) a difference in the expression of a putative coreceptor for membrane fusion, 16,17 (iii) a difference in the intracellular signal induced by T-cell activation, which could have affected the transcription of SeV after entry. 15 To explore these factors, we performed the following experiments using murine T cells, the experiments in which it was not necessary to separate naive T cells from activated/ memory T cells.…”
Section: Entry Of the Sev Vector After Cell Surface Attachment Occumentioning
confidence: 99%