2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2013.01.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitive ergotamine determination in pharmaceuticals and biological samples using cloud point preconcentration and spectrofluorimetric detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonionic surfactant PONPE 7.5 (Fig. ) was selected for CPE because of some experimental advantage such as low critical cloud point and low UV‐Visible signal background . In order to study the influence of experimental parameters on CPE, a systematic study was applied for each parameter.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nonionic surfactant PONPE 7.5 (Fig. ) was selected for CPE because of some experimental advantage such as low critical cloud point and low UV‐Visible signal background . In order to study the influence of experimental parameters on CPE, a systematic study was applied for each parameter.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous works, CPE has proved to be efficient for monitoring drugs level in biological samples. The most important advantage of CPE is that only a small amount of surfactant is required and consequently the procedure is less expensive and more environmentally friendly than other conventional extraction techniques such as liquid extraction and solid–liquid extraction . Moreover, CPE offers the possibility of combining extraction and preconcentration in one step.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ELISA method has been used primarily when scientists are interested in determining the concentration of total ergot alkaloids, not particular alkaloids (Stuedemann et al, 1998; Hill et al, 2000; Ayers et al, 2009). However, the ELISA assay lacks selectivity as it does not differentiate between ergot alkaloids which have necessitated the use of chromatographic methods to detect specific ergot alkaloids (Schultz et al, 2006; De Lorme et al, 2007; Foote et al, 2012; Wang et al, 2013). Schnitzius et al (2001), compared HPLC and ELISA detection of ergot alkaloids and found the methods were inconsistent in their identification of alkaloids, concluding that both had their advantages and disadvantages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, chromatographic methods had relatively high detection limits (Yates and Powell, 1988; Rottinghaus et al, 1991; Moubarak et al, 1996); however, more recent advances in chromatographic and detection methods have vastly improved the sensitivities of the assays (Lehner et al, 2005; Smith et al, 2009; Foote et al, 2012; Wang et al, 2013). Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay is a faster method for detection of ergot alkaloids and has been used to screen livestock exposure to fescue toxins (Shelby and Kelley, 1990; Hill and Agee, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EGT in urine, blood, and hair samples has also been identified using an LC-MS method [ 17 ]. A spectrofluorimetry technique was also used to measure EGT in pharmaceuticals, urine, and saliva samples [ 18 ]. EGT, caffeine, and metamizol are all simultaneously determined using a high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) method from combined dosage form [ 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%