2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.04.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity analysis of a catchment-scale nitrogen model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
51
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sources of uncertainty are manifold (see Jakeman et al, 1993;New & Hulme, 2000;McIntyre et al, 2005;Wilby, 2005). The emission scenarios used in GCMs are subject to uncertainty in predictions of population growth, economic activity and, hence, emission rates.…”
Section: Model Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sources of uncertainty are manifold (see Jakeman et al, 1993;New & Hulme, 2000;McIntyre et al, 2005;Wilby, 2005). The emission scenarios used in GCMs are subject to uncertainty in predictions of population growth, economic activity and, hence, emission rates.…”
Section: Model Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been developed a lot of mathematical and numerical models to simulate the water quality. These models are able to simulate the real situation at streams, however the range of the reliability and accuracy of the results is very wide [Abbott 1978, Jolánkai 1992, Pekárová and Velísková 1998, Říha et al 2000, Rankinen et al 2002, McInstyre et al 2005.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One other aspect that needs to be considered in any modelling study is that of model uncertainty. INCA-N has been the subject of many uncertainty investigations, including Whitehead et al, 1998b, Wade et al, 2002, and McIntyre et al, 2005. All these studies demonstrate that process based models are difficult to calibrate and there is always some degree of equifinality occurring, whereby processes can duplicate behaviours making it difficult to find truly unique parameter sets.…”
Section: Inca-n Model Calibration and Validation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%