2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10548-007-0031-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of EEG and MEG to the N1 and P2 Auditory Evoked Responses Modulated by Spectral Complexity of Sounds

Abstract: Acoustic complexity of a stimulus has been shown to modulate the electromagnetic N1 (latency ~110 ms) and P2 (latency ~190 ms) auditory evoked responses. We compared the relative sensitivity of electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) to these neural correlates of sensation. Simultaneous EEG and MEG were recorded while participants listened to three variants of a piano tone. The piano stimuli differed in their number of harmonics: the fundamental frequency (f 0 ), only,or f 0 and the first… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
38
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
6
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The cortical current density distributions of the N100 and P200 were very diffuse and resembled their known distributions on the overlying scalp (Huotilainen et al 1998;Shahin et al 2007). This is in contrast with established MEG results localising their sources in superior temporal regions (Huotilainen et al 1998;Shahin et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The cortical current density distributions of the N100 and P200 were very diffuse and resembled their known distributions on the overlying scalp (Huotilainen et al 1998;Shahin et al 2007). This is in contrast with established MEG results localising their sources in superior temporal regions (Huotilainen et al 1998;Shahin et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The cortical current density distributions of the N100 and P200 were very diffuse and resembled their known distributions on the overlying scalp (Huotilainen et al 1998;Shahin et al 2007). This is in contrast with established MEG results localising their sources in superior temporal regions (Huotilainen et al 1998;Shahin et al 2007). It is also in contrast with other ERP studies conducted with a larger number of electrodes, reporting high current density in superior temporal regions for these components (Mulert et al 2005;Zaehle et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This inconsistency might be related to differences in the used stimulus material and task requirements. Also different sources underlying MEG and EEG signal might contribute to this inconsistency (Shahin et al 2007). With respect to the varying stimulation materials it is reasonable to assume that differences in the functional lateralization in some studies are caused by the differential use of a ''between-channel'' gap detection paradigm in contrast to a ''within-channel'' paradigm (Phillips et al 1997(Phillips et al , 1998Phillips and Smith 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%