Sensorimotor responsiveness and resolution in the giraffe

Abstract

SUMMARYThe ability of an animal to detect and respond to changes in the environment is crucial to its survival. However, two elements of sensorimotor control -the time required to respond to a stimulus (responsiveness) and the precision of stimulus detection and response production (resolution) -are inherently limited by a competition for space in peripheral nerves and muscles. These limitations only become more acute as animal size increases. In this paper, we investigated whether the physiology of giraffes has found unique solutions for maintaining sensorimotor performance in order to compensate for their extreme size. To examine responsiveness, we quantified three major sources of delay: nerve conduction delay, muscle electromechanical delay and force generation delay. To examine resolution, we quantified the number and size distribution of nerve fibers in the sciatic nerve. Rather than possessing a particularly unique sensorimotor system, we found that our measurements in giraffes were broadly comparable to size-dependent trends seen across other terrestrial mammals. Consequently, both giraffes and other large animals must contend with greater sensorimotor delays and lower innervation density in comparison to smaller animals. Because of their unconventional leg length, giraffes may experience even longer delays compared with other animals of the same mass when sensing distal stimuli. While there are certainly advantages to being tall, there appear to be challenges as well -our results suggest that giraffes are less able to precisely and accurately sense and respond to stimuli using feedback alone, particularly when moving quickly.

Giraffe genome sequence reveals clues to its unique morphology and physiology

“…The origin of giraffe's iconic long neck and legs, which combine to elevate its stature to the tallest terrestrial animal, has intrigued mankind throughout recorded history and became a focal point of conflicting evolutionary theories proposed by Lamarck and Darwin. Giraffe's unique anatomy imposes considerable existential challenges and three systems bear the greatest burden: the cardiovascular system to maintain blood pressure homeostasis 1 , the musculoskeletal system to support a vertically elongated body mass 2 and the nervous system to rapidly relay signalling over long neural networks 3 4 . To pump blood vertically 2 m from the heart to the brain giraffe has evolved a turbocharged heart and twofold greater blood pressure than other mammals 1 5 .…”

Allometry unleashed: an adaptationist approach of brain scaling in mammalian evolution

“…Importantly, the hypothesis that the somatic factor is a fundamental factor in the evolution of the brain components involved in the treatment of body signal does not necessarily mean that the functional properties are maintained between small and large animals (see More et al 2010, but also Schmitt et al 2013, Heldstab et al 2016. Indeed, the fact that axonal conduction velocity does not scale proportionally with body size might force larger species to rely more on predictions to control their body movements (More et al 2010(More et al , 2013; thereby contributing to the enlargement of the brain components involved in this aspect of the somatic factor.…”

Understanding the agility of running birds: Sensorimotor and mechanical factors in avian bipedal locomotion

“…One inherent challenge of animal systems is sensorimotor delay that limits feedback response times ( More et al. 2010 ; 2013 ). Sensorimotor delays include delays from sensing, nerve transmission, synapses, muscle electromechanical coupling, and muscle force development ( More et al.…”

“…2010 ; 2013 ). Sensorimotor delays include delays from sensing, nerve transmission, synapses, muscle electromechanical coupling, and muscle force development ( More et al. 2013 ).…”