2020
DOI: 10.1016/bs.afnr.2020.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensory methods applied to the development of probiotic and prebiotic foods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The generalisability of our results is limited by the small sample size and the subjective nature of the data collected. However, our approach used the 9‐point hedonic scale, a validated methodological tool that has been used to assess the acceptability of foods and beverages for over 40 years (Munoz & King, 2007; Gambaro & McSweeney, 2020; Johnson; Wang et al, 2022). Further, the known organoleptic changes to food and beverages due to iron make the application of this scale an appropriate methodologic approach for our study (Allen et al, 2006; Bovell‐Benjamin and Guinard, 2010; Huma et al, 2007; Hurrell, 2021; Swain et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generalisability of our results is limited by the small sample size and the subjective nature of the data collected. However, our approach used the 9‐point hedonic scale, a validated methodological tool that has been used to assess the acceptability of foods and beverages for over 40 years (Munoz & King, 2007; Gambaro & McSweeney, 2020; Johnson; Wang et al, 2022). Further, the known organoleptic changes to food and beverages due to iron make the application of this scale an appropriate methodologic approach for our study (Allen et al, 2006; Bovell‐Benjamin and Guinard, 2010; Huma et al, 2007; Hurrell, 2021; Swain et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples of the two products were served chilled at 5°C in small plastic cups. Participants assessed acidity, viscosity, color, and aroma of the products, based on nine-point hedonic face scale ( 38 ) where 1 is “terrible,” 2 is “very bad,” 3 is “bad,” 4 is “just a little bad,” 5 is “maybe good or maybe bad,” 6 is “just a little good,” 7 is “good,” 8 is “very good,” and 9 is “great.” Subsequently, participants were asked to express, on a 1–9 range scale, their overall acceptability and interest to buy the product. They were asked to start with the plain LL-PBB and then to taste the sweet LL-PBB.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples evaluated must be identical in appearance. The taste of the product was rated on a scale from 1 to 9, where 1 = extremely unpleasant and 9 = extremely pleasant [ 57 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%