2004
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2004.22.14_suppl.3506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sentinel node staging of resectable colon cancer: Results of CALGB 80001

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
26
0
8

Year Published

2005
2005
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
26
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…A main strength of the study is that all lymph nodes have been treated equally and processed in an identical fashion. Only few other studies 28,29 have used the ultraprocessing technique on both sentinel and nonsentinel nodes, and they have obtained sensitivity and false-negative rates within the range of ours. Most studies 20-26 use ultraprocessing techniques only on the sentinel nodes, and include micrometastases and submicrometastases found in the sentinel nodes as ordinary metastases, giving a higher sensitivity and lower rate of false negativity when the nonsentinel nodes are not examined.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…A main strength of the study is that all lymph nodes have been treated equally and processed in an identical fashion. Only few other studies 28,29 have used the ultraprocessing technique on both sentinel and nonsentinel nodes, and they have obtained sensitivity and false-negative rates within the range of ours. Most studies 20-26 use ultraprocessing techniques only on the sentinel nodes, and include micrometastases and submicrometastases found in the sentinel nodes as ordinary metastases, giving a higher sensitivity and lower rate of false negativity when the nonsentinel nodes are not examined.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…High falsenegative rates are reported in several multicenter studies [11][12][13]. Other authors show more favorable results [8,9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Falsenegative rates in fact varied from 0% to 60% [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. This astonishing range has several explanations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%