Separation distance to avoid odour nuisance due to livestock calculated by the Austrian odour dispersion model (AODM)

Schauberger, Günther; Piringer, Martin; Petz, E.

doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(00)00299-1

Cited by 42 publications

(29 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Another interesting tool to select the adequate annoyance criteria is suggested in Watts and Sweeten (1995) and Schauberger et al (2001). It is summarized in Fig.…”

Section: Odour Annoyance Criterionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…5 ou m -3 as the annoyance threshold and knowing that 1 ou m -3 is the perception threshold, the former reasoning shows that perceiving the odour during 9% of annual time at a distance of about 300 m (C 91.1-h < 1.0 ou E m -3 , point 5) corresponds approximately to feeling an annoyance at the same distance during 2% of time (C 98.1-h < 5.0 ou E m -3 , point 6). Watts andSweeten, 1995 andby Schauberger et al, 2001 ).…”

Section: Odour Annoyance Criterionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A lot of formulas are proposed in many countries and comparisons between national guidelines are extensively discussed in the literature (Guo et al, 2004;Preston and Furberg, 2006;Schauberger et al, 2001 ; ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Most guidelines were already empirically derived on the basis of practical field surveys (VDI, 2001), some of them were analysed and sometimes adapted by subsequent studies (Bongers et al, 2001 ). Many interesting works compare also the buffer zone approach to the area delimited by a percentile calculated by an atmospheric dispersion model (Schauberger et al, 2001;Hayes et al, 2006). They constitute powerful tools for further investigation.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Development and validating procedure of a formula to calculate a minimum separation distance from piggeries and poultry facilities to sensitive receptors

Nicolas

Delva

Cobut

et al. 2008

Atmospheric Environment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A specific formula to calculate separation distance from piggeries and poultry facilities to sensitive receptor is developed for Walloon Region, in Belgium. The paper briefly presents the main principles of the formula and discusses more deeply the compatibility of the distance approach with odour units, odour rate and percentiles usually applied to assess the odour annoyance zones. A method of validation is presented and tested to adjust the different parameters of the formula to Belgian field reality. A total of 43 farms of which 21 piggeries and 22 poultry facilities are visited and, for each case, the distance calculated by the formula is compared to the one deduced from odour annoyance criterion (10 ou m -3 at 98th percentile). Validation work results in discussing the sensibility of different factors of the formula and especially in adjusting a fitting factor to match the absolute distances to real field annoyance impression. Conclusions show that both approaches -separation distance formula and percentile evaluation -are coherent. The validation method allows parameter adjustment but should need further refinements to examine separately piggeries and poultry facilities.

show abstract

“…Another interesting tool to select the adequate annoyance criteria is suggested in Watts and Sweeten (1995) and Schauberger et al (2001). It is summarized in Fig.…”

Section: Odour Annoyance Criterionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Odour Annoyance Criterionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Development and validating procedure of a formula to calculate a minimum separation distance from piggeries and poultry facilities to sensitive receptors

Nicolas

Delva

Cobut

et al. 2008

Atmospheric Environment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Odour emission from livestock is a territorial problem for agricultural areas, not only restricted to 2 the peri-urban ones (Schauberger et al, 2001). Authorisation for the construction of new stables 3 often requires a prior assessment of odour dispersion.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%