2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2012.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequential therapy versus standard triple-drug therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: Result of the HPFEZ randomised study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
12
2
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
12
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are almost the same as our study. In another study, Lahbabi et al showed that sequential therapy had 94.2% and 96% successful eradication rate using intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis respectively (20). In this study, like our study, it was shown that the sequential therapy method in comparison with other methods had better efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are almost the same as our study. In another study, Lahbabi et al showed that sequential therapy had 94.2% and 96% successful eradication rate using intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis respectively (20). In this study, like our study, it was shown that the sequential therapy method in comparison with other methods had better efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…In the study of Nasa et al, unlike our study, the prevalence of side effects was not significantly different between the two groups, and was 23.5% and 14.6% in the sequential therapy group and the standard triple therapy group, respectively (19). In the study of Lahbabi et al similar to our study, the prevalence of drug side effects in the sequential therapy group was 6.9% which was significantly lower than the standard triple therapy group (20). The study of Vaira et al mentioned the incidence of drug side effects by 17% in each group, which was not statistically significant and is contradictory with our study results (21).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…Two recent clinical trials conducted in Morocco suggested a high rate of clarithromycin resistance. The first, conducted in 2009, showed eradication rates lower than 80% for clarithromycin-based triple therapy (ITT 78.2, PP 79.6) and the second, conducted in 2012, showed a decline in the eradication rates achieved by this regimen (ITT 65.9, PP 71), thereby suggesting an increase of the resistance rate to clarithromycin [5,6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Morocco, two randomized studies were performed comparing sequential to standard therapy. In both, sequential therapy performed impressively against standard triple, with ITT eradication rates of 65.9% in the standard triple therapy group and 82.8 in the sequential therapy group in one, and 94.2% for sequential and 70% for metronidazole‐based triple therapy and 78% for clarithromycin‐based triple in the other . Another two randomized, prospective studies carried out in India also showed significantly better eradication rates for sequential therapy .…”
Section: Non‐bismuth Quadruple Sequential and Concomitant Therapymentioning
confidence: 92%