2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2012.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serial and panel analyses of biomarkers do not improve the prediction of bacteremia compared to one procalcitonin measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
28
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with previous studies [16], [17], [26], also this study shows that PCT is a good biomarker to predict bacteremia, as detected by blood culture. In a study on 79 patients, PCT levels observed in patients with a positive SF assay were higher than those observed in patients with a negative one, but the difference was not statistically significant [27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In line with previous studies [16], [17], [26], also this study shows that PCT is a good biomarker to predict bacteremia, as detected by blood culture. In a study on 79 patients, PCT levels observed in patients with a positive SF assay were higher than those observed in patients with a negative one, but the difference was not statistically significant [27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Procalcitonin is considered a good biomarker of sepsis that correlates with the extent and severity of infection [14] and a reliable test to rule out or predict bacteremia in patients with acute fever [16], [17] and pneumonia [26]. In line with previous studies [16], [17], [26], also this study shows that PCT is a good biomarker to predict bacteremia, as detected by blood culture.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, this strategy has been shown to improve the diagnostic value of single markers in some 22,33,34 _ENRE-F_22_ENREF_1, although not all studies. 30,92 Most biomarkers examined are stimulated both by bacterial and viral pathogens, but reach higher concentrations during bacterial infection. Therefore, moderately increased levels of these biomarkers can be found during both bacterial and viral infections, limiting the sensitivity.…”
Section: Combination Of Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 di penderita yang kritis di ICU, dengan nilai cut off 2 ng/mL didapatkan kepekaan 96%; kekhasan 86%; nilai duga positif 81% dan nilai duga negatif 97%. Hasil telitian ini juga sama dengan hasil telitian sebelumnya oleh Tromp et al 29 yang juga membandingkan PCT dengan IL-6 dan tolok ukur sepsis lainnya seperti: lipopolysaccharidebinding protein (LBP) dan C-reactive protein (CRP). Di hasil telitian tersebut ditemukan PCT memiliki nilai diagnostik yang lebih tinggi dibandingkan IL-6.…”
Section: Diagnosis Sepsisunclassified