2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2004.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serological markers during dengue 3 primary and secondary infections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
42
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Statistical significance was P 0.05. infection may be related to inefficient detection of NS1 during secondary infections. [35][36][37][38] In summary, these results suggest that during primary infections, levels of circulating NS1 are higher in patients with DHF than in patients with DF. Nonetheless, our results and other results 18,20 also suggest that concentrations of circulating NS1 are affected by the infecting serotype and the immunologic status (i.e., primary or secondary infection) of the patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Statistical significance was P 0.05. infection may be related to inefficient detection of NS1 during secondary infections. [35][36][37][38] In summary, these results suggest that during primary infections, levels of circulating NS1 are higher in patients with DHF than in patients with DF. Nonetheless, our results and other results 18,20 also suggest that concentrations of circulating NS1 are affected by the infecting serotype and the immunologic status (i.e., primary or secondary infection) of the patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…3,4 The impact of dengue on the natural course of pregnancy and labour and the maternal and fetal outcomes were noted.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors have described IgE antibodies elevation in patients with dengue infections. [46] found both total and specific increased of IgE levels in patients with DHF, [47] observed higher levels of total IgE in dengue patients contrary to control group (subjects with no exposure); [48] observed higher levels of specific IgE in DHF/DSS cases than DF cases and healthy individuals; [13] found significant differences of IgE OD ratios between primary and secondary dengue cases, observing the higher values for the last group. Similar to IgA response, IgE OD ratios were detectable in secondary D and SD infection while in primary was absent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In-house ELISA tests were used with the conditions previously established: IgM, IgA and IgE antibody capture immunoassays (MAC-ELISA, AAC-ELISA, EAC-ELISA) and ELISA Inhibition Method (EIM) for IgG antibody detection [13] [14]. A serum sample was considered positive by MAC and AAC-ELISA when the optical density ratio (OD ratio) was ≥2 and for EAC-ELISA test ≥ 1.4.…”
Section: Elisa Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%