2018
DOI: 10.1504/ijsom.2018.088474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Service gap deployment: a framework to link quality gaps to service activities

Abstract: This paper presents the service gap deployment (SGD), a new method to prioritise crucial to quality activities of a service that does not completely satisfy customer expectations. In the SGD, service activities (SAs) are related to gaps between customer expectations and perceptions so as to identify SAs that may need a redesign or improvement in order to satisfy customer needs. The method, which expands the gaps model of service quality by Parasuraman et al. (1985), supports the design of evolutionary and sust… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, despite the apparent negative consequences due to brands' transgressions, it appears as though branding research predominantly focus on positive brand associations (Lee, Conroy and Moton, 2009a;Platania, Morando and Santisi, 2017;Zarantonello, Romani, Grappi and Fetscherin, 2018), including brand attachment (Japutra, Ekinci and Simkin, 2014), brand love (Batra, Ahuvia, and Bagozzi, 2012) and brand affection (Tse and Chan, 2008). The negative associations with brands have received limited attention, and particularly so concerning service brands (De Chernatony and Segal-Horn, 2003;Veloutsou and Guzman, 2017), which are often characterised by their complexity due to service delivery processes (Franceschini and Mastrogiacomo, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite the apparent negative consequences due to brands' transgressions, it appears as though branding research predominantly focus on positive brand associations (Lee, Conroy and Moton, 2009a;Platania, Morando and Santisi, 2017;Zarantonello, Romani, Grappi and Fetscherin, 2018), including brand attachment (Japutra, Ekinci and Simkin, 2014), brand love (Batra, Ahuvia, and Bagozzi, 2012) and brand affection (Tse and Chan, 2008). The negative associations with brands have received limited attention, and particularly so concerning service brands (De Chernatony and Segal-Horn, 2003;Veloutsou and Guzman, 2017), which are often characterised by their complexity due to service delivery processes (Franceschini and Mastrogiacomo, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As represented in Table 4, the expectations were found to be higher than the perceptions across all the SERVQUAL dimensions ( p < 0.05 for all the gaps in both groups). Alternatively, the median values would have been an appropriate central tendency indicator to avoid the effect of extreme evaluations (outliers (Franceschini and Mastrogiacomo, 2018). Along this line, the findings also suggest a statistically significant gap when the medians of perceptions and expectations are taken into the account.…”
Section: Results and Key Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Responsiveness is the willingness to assist customers, while assurance involves conveying trust and confidence (Ali & Raza, 2017;Jiang et al, 2016). Meanwhile, empathy represents the attention and care given to the customers (Franceschini & Mastrogiacomo, 2018). Service quality significantly influences the satisfaction of online ridesharing customers (Fariza et al, 2021;Lestariningsih, 2021;Mustari & Said, 2020).…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%