2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12652-020-02441-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Service selection using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making: a comprehensive review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sun et al [69] further extended the review to analyze different CV selection models with diverse preference structures. Masdari & Khezri [54] have recently prepared a detailed review of varying MCDM models for CV selection. All these review papers infer the urge for a systematic approach to CV selection.…”
Section: Selection Made By Using Mcdm Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sun et al [69] further extended the review to analyze different CV selection models with diverse preference structures. Masdari & Khezri [54] have recently prepared a detailed review of varying MCDM models for CV selection. All these review papers infer the urge for a systematic approach to CV selection.…”
Section: Selection Made By Using Mcdm Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the realm of solutions to the issue, researchers adopt MCDM approaches. Sun et al [69] and Masdari & Khezri [54] made interesting reviews on CV selection by using MCDM concepts, from which it can be inferred that (i) these models are unable to handle views/preferences from multiple users/experts and (ii) complex linguistic expressions are not formulated well for rational decision-making. These inferences motivated the following research lacunae:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several service selection frameworks based on fuzzy multicriteria decision making (MCDM) methods have been proposed in the literature. In Masdari and Khezri (2020) MCDM techniques are adapted to handle fuzziness of users' preferences and QoS properties to provide a more effective ranking of available services to select the most appropriate ones according to QoS factors. In Qi et al (2018), a discrete differential evolution algorithm for global quality composition optimisation is proposed, evaluating the typical QoS attributes that are service response time, availability and reliability.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, the various classifications of services based on criteria as functional purpose, distribution area, presentation conditions, nature of consumption, etc. are presented in research reports as well as in reports of international organizations such as the United Nations, the World Trade Association and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [5,6].…”
Section: Lntroductionmentioning
confidence: 99%