2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10862-017-9587-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Set-Congruent Priming Stimuli Normalize the Information Processing of Psychopathic Offenders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hiatt, Schmitt & Newman., 2004), and of normalized emotional processing following proscribed attention (e.g. Dargis, Mattern & Newman, 2017), have proven increasingly challenging for emotion-deficit theories to incorporate. Thus, more recent explanations have posited specific, largely automatic, attentional deficits that preclude optimal attentional allocation to goal-incongruent information (e.g.…”
Section: Attentional Deficits and Normalized Affective Processing Following Proscribed Attentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hiatt, Schmitt & Newman., 2004), and of normalized emotional processing following proscribed attention (e.g. Dargis, Mattern & Newman, 2017), have proven increasingly challenging for emotion-deficit theories to incorporate. Thus, more recent explanations have posited specific, largely automatic, attentional deficits that preclude optimal attentional allocation to goal-incongruent information (e.g.…”
Section: Attentional Deficits and Normalized Affective Processing Following Proscribed Attentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emotion-deficit theories argue, somewhat awkwardly, that these abnormalities exist as information-processing consequences of the psychopath’s reduced sensitivity to aversive and/or emotionally valent stimuli. However, several recent demonstrations of attentional abnormalities to non-emotional stimuli (e.g., Hiatt et al, 2004), and of normalized emotional processing following proscribed attention (e.g., Dargis, Mattern, & Newman, 2017), have proven increasingly challenging for emotion-deficit theories to incorporate. Thus, more recent explanations have posited specific, largely automatic, attentional deficits that preclude optimal attentional allocation to goal-incongruent information (e.g., Hamilton et al, 2015; Patterson & Newman, 1993).…”
Section: Reconceptualizing Fundamental Characteristics Of Psychopathy...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is likely that conventional intervention strategies are ineffective to treat psychopaths because they learn better techniques to manipulate others (Moreira, Almeida, Pinto, & Fávero, 2014). Instead, some authors suspect that specific interventions that take psychopathic traits into consideration might have a positive impact on treatment outcomes (Felthous, 2015;Reidy, Kearns, & DeGue, 2013); recent studies implementing alternative and specific intervention programs targeted at psychopathic individuals have obtained encouraging results (Burt, Olver, & Wong, 2016;Dargis, Mattern, & Newman, 2017). Thus, research targeted at the identification of psychopathic batterers is imperative to design effective, specific BIPs for psychopathic batterers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This in turn may aid the development of treatment and prevention programs. As argued by Dargis at al. (2017), treatment efforts emphasizing a balance of attention between primary and peripheral information may prove especially effective for reducing maladaptive behavior in psychopathic individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…However, when psychopathic individuals' focus of attention was manipulated such that there was no prepotent focus of attention or when peripheral information was spatially coincident (Hiatt et al, 2004) they displayed as much interference as controls. Additionally, psychopathic individuals' deficits in using peripheral information seem to be specific to incongruent stimuli (outside of attentional focus), since psychopathic individuals were found to demonstrate a normal or stronger facilitation effect of peripherally presented stimuli congruent with attentional focus (Hiatt et al, 2004;Dargis, Mattern, & Newman, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%