2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-42019-6_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Setting Standards for Altering and Undoing Smart Contracts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the mixed flavour of our analysis, which compares differents platforms and studies how smart contracts are interpreted on each them, our work relates to various topics. The work [38] proposes design patterns for altering and undoing of smart contracts; so far, our analysis in Section 4.2 has not still found instances of these patterns in Ethereum. Among the works which study blockchain technologies, [15] compares four blockchains, with a special focus on the Ethereum one; [45] examines a larger set of blockchains, including also some which does not fit the criteria we have used in our methodology (e.g., RootStock and Tezos).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the mixed flavour of our analysis, which compares differents platforms and studies how smart contracts are interpreted on each them, our work relates to various topics. The work [38] proposes design patterns for altering and undoing of smart contracts; so far, our analysis in Section 4.2 has not still found instances of these patterns in Ethereum. Among the works which study blockchain technologies, [15] compares four blockchains, with a special focus on the Ethereum one; [45] examines a larger set of blockchains, including also some which does not fit the criteria we have used in our methodology (e.g., RootStock and Tezos).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• A set of standards for modifying/terminating smart contracts [19]. Lack of support to identify underoptimised smart contracts [20].…”
Section: Smart Contract Issues Proposed Solutions Codifying Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with others we also hope 'smart' contracts have been around for a long timewe at least try not to write dumb ones (Giancaspo 2017). For this research we studied and analyzed with minor success: smart contract terminology (Mik 2017), technical side of the law (Simpson-Murphy 2016), various legal issues associated with the application of existing contract law provisions implemented on the Blockchain platform (Simpson 2016), the internal side of the law (Giancaspro 2017), block chain for justice (Mariana 2016) and a new concept of rule technologies (Marino 2016)…”
Section: Smart Contractmentioning
confidence: 99%