Settlement location models, archaeological survey data and social change in Bronze Age Crete

Abstract

This paper builds spatial models of Bronze Age settlement using published survey datasets from the Mirabello region in east Crete. Methodologically, we examine how point process modelling can account for uncertainties in legacy survey datasets, and thereafter can highlight patterns of both cultural change and continuity in Mirabello settlement. Comparison of fitted models over different chronological periods gives an insight, we argue, into the kinds of settlement and subsistence choices that lay behind settlement patterns, holding constant the broadly similar environmental constraints faced by inhabitants throughout the Bronze Age. Overall, the results suggest prehistoric preference for, and exploitation of, agriculturally favourable parts of the landscape, although contrasting emphases in different periods do emerge despite this unsurprising overall preference. Many of the analytical results prove robust to a sensitivity analysis which addresses commonplace uncertainties associated with settlement survey data. The results also dovetail well with previous archaeological interpretations of changing settlement and Bronze Age life in the Mirabello region. Survey datasets are also relatively common in other archaeological settings worldwide and we advocate for more widespread application of similarly formalised methods to them.

Rapa Nui (Easter Island) monument (ahu) locations explained by freshwater sources

“…The expectation is that if Rapa Nui’s monuments were built, in part, to signal territorial resource control, then there should be a spatial association between ahu and the resources they are signaling control over [17]. In our work, we follow an information criteria model-selection approach using point-process models [24–27]. Our analyses combine existing data for the coverage of agricultural fields [28], marine resource locations, and include data from our ongoing study of the island’s freshwater sources [29,30].…”

Algorithmic Classification and Statistical Modelling of Coastal Settlement Patterns in Mesolithic South-Eastern Norway

“…Here it was decided to focus on the possible relevance of aspect as related to sunlight, as the other proposed reasons for why aspect might be relevant should be captured by other variables. The aspect of each location, calculated as degrees from north, was therefore transformed to deviance from south by finding the absolute distance of each value from 180 degrees (Spencer & Bevan 2018).…”

“…However, the term stepwise selection is typically taken to refer to a form of automated model selection that has also seen application in archaeology (e.g. Bevan et al 2013;Visentin & Carrer 2017;Spencer & Bevan 2018;Wachtel et al 2018). Here, independent variables are excluded or included in the model at sequential steps that are stopped once a statistic that determines the relative success of the models does not improve.…”

“…Continuous variables were then normalised to take on values between 0 and 1 to better facilitate a comparison of the impact of each variable, although at the cost of distorting the interpretability of effect sizes (cf. Spencer & Bevan 2018). In the random forests, the variables were included using raw values.…”

Transforming Legacy Spatial Data into Testable Hypotheses about Socioeconomic Organization

“…In many parts of the world, archaeologists have recorded site locations as well as other site characteristics (e.g., site size, socioeconomic activities, temporal and cultural affiliations) via large-scale systematic survey. Researchers have developed new techniques to use systematically collected legacy databases to address questions about regional organization and social dynamics in the past (see Casarotto et al 2016, 2019; Spencer and Bevan 2018; Ullah 2015).…”