Seven Approaches to Manage Complex Coupled Human and Natural Systems: A Sustainability Toolbox

Abstract

Since the publication of the Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development in 1987, there have been numerous studies on sustainability. These studies created new knowledge and tools for understanding and managing complex coupled human and natural systems. In this Critical Review, we used a topic modeling technique to analyze 12 526 peer-reviewed research articles and identify the research questions and the approaches that were used or developed in each of the studies. These approaches were then classified by function. The analysis revealed twenty-three categories of research questions and seven functional approach classesdesign for sustainability, modeling of complexity, sustainability indicators, life cycle sustainability assessment, decision making support, sustainability governance, and engagementeach of which is described here as an individual approach or tool within a larger sustainability toolbox. The article concludes with a discussion about using the sustainability toolbox as an integrated knowledge system to support transdisciplinary study and decision-making.

Quantitative Sustainable Design (QSD) for the Prioritization of Research, Development, and Deployment of Technologies: A Tutorial and Review

“…They reflect the local and regional nature of primary stressors to humans and the environment, 13 accounting for economic (e.g., tax rates, unit costs), environmental (e.g., ambient temperatures), social (e.g., household size), political (e.g., regulations), and other conditions in which the system exists. 75,76 As one example, outcomes associated with energy-intensive technologies may be especially sensitive to the characteristics of the local electricity grid, which can vary widely across and within countries.…”

Measuring raw-material criticality of product systems through an economic product importance indicator: a case study of battery-electric vehicles

“…Several approaches and methodologies for such a sustainability assessment have been developed, varying in scope, detail, and comprehensiveness (Lu et al 2019;Sala et al 2015Sala et al , 2013a, with the life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) framework (Finkbeiner et al 2010;Kloepffer 2008) being one rather comprehensive approach, which is frequently applied and focuses on products and processes while taking a life cycle perspective (Onat et al 2017;Sala et al 2013b;Wulf et al 2019). Originating from the environmentally focussed life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, developmental efforts with regard to LCSA have been -and still are -to a large extent concerned with the extension and operationalisation as well as integration of economic (e.g.…”

Introducing an innovative design to examine human-environment dynamics of food deserts responding to COVID-19

“…In this research brief, we propose a coupled human and natural systems (CHANS) integrated design (Liu et al, 2007) to examine humanenvironment dynamics of food deserts to identify strategies that would provide effective planning to prevent, prepare for, or respond to disruptive events such as natural disasters or pandemics in the future. The CHANS approach has been identified as a potent framework to address the design for sustainability of regional planning, agriculture, and soil and water resource management (Kline et al, 2017;Lu et al, 2019) In this paper, we utilize data from North Carolina as an example that highlights how an unpredictable event could exacerbate public health in food desert communities. We then explain how the model focused on food deserts could be developed using a CHANS framework and the types of data that the model could use.…”