2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2018.04.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Severity assessment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic COPRAS method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the result of Definition 3, the scores of (26) and (27) can be computed. Therefore, we can identify the minimal value of R i using the formulae…”
Section: The Extended Copras Methods With Dhfmsmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following the result of Definition 3, the scores of (26) and (27) can be computed. Therefore, we can identify the minimal value of R i using the formulae…”
Section: The Extended Copras Methods With Dhfmsmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Zolfani et al 25 used the COPRAS method to assess environmental issues. Zheng et al 26 researched on severity assessment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic COPRAS method. Furthermore, Schitea et al 27 used COPRAS to solve hydrogen mobility roll-up site selection problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Chatterjee et al [48,49] and Mousavi-Nasab et al [23] extended the COPRAS method for material selection. Zheng et al [50] proposed a hesitant fuzzy linguistic COPRAS method and applied the same for medical application. Chatterjee and Kar [5,51] presented a hybrid model by extending the COPRAS method fuzzy and Z-number context and used the same for the evaluation of the telecommunication industry and renewable energy sources.…”
Section: Q-rofs Based Copras Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, many MCDM methods under the HFL environment have been presented, such as the HFL-AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) (Tuysuz & Berna, 2017;Mi et al, 2019b), HFL-BWM (Liao, Mi, Yu, & Luo, 2019a), HFL-TOPSIS method (Beg, & Rashid, 2013), HFL-COPRAS method (Zheng, Xu, He, & Liao, 2018), HFL-VIKOR method (Liao, Xu, & Zeng, 2015a), and HFL-MABAC (Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison) method (Sun, Hu, Zhou, & Chen, 2018). The AHP method is a popular MCDM method which is often used to calculate weights of criteria.…”
Section: Literature Review On Applications Of Mcdm Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%