1959
DOI: 10.1037/h0041896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual exhaustion and recovery in the male hamster.

Abstract: Larsson (1956) and Beach and Jordan (1956) have described sexual exhaustion and recovery in the male rat. The present study was conducted to obtain comparable data for another species belonging to the same order. METHOD Selection and Maintenance of SubjectsThe 5s were 20 male hamsters (Cricetits aura/its) approximately 90 days old at the beginning of experimentation. They were born.and reared in the Yale laboratory. Males were selected on the basis of their performance in a preliminary mating test in which … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The copulation scores of testosterone-implanted males did not rise with each successive test; five out of twelve males which attained ejaculation failed to ejaculate on at least one subsequent test. Inter-test intervals of at least 1 week were such that the effects of performance in the previous test should have been dissipated (Beach & Rabedeau, 1959). This variation in performance, while testosterone is maintained at a high level by slow-release implants, agrees with studies in the rat by Damassa et al (1977).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The copulation scores of testosterone-implanted males did not rise with each successive test; five out of twelve males which attained ejaculation failed to ejaculate on at least one subsequent test. Inter-test intervals of at least 1 week were such that the effects of performance in the previous test should have been dissipated (Beach & Rabedeau, 1959). This variation in performance, while testosterone is maintained at a high level by slow-release implants, agrees with studies in the rat by Damassa et al (1977).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…If necessary, males were given extra time and/or placed with a different stimulus female to facilitate ejaculation. The week-long period between mating exposures ensured that males would successfully copulate at each mating test without becoming sexually satiated (Arteaga, Motte-Lara, and Velazquez-Moctezuma, 2000; Beach and Rabedeau, 1959). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This pattern remained unchanged between the first and last day of testing, a finding suggesting that the mechanisms regulating the ongoing display of sexual activity operate in the same way regardless of the male's sexual satiety state. Data in other species show common parameters indicative of sexual satiety: thus, in hamsters copulation ad libitum causes a steady increase in the lengths of the pauses that follow successive ejaculations (Beach and Rabedeau, 1959). Male guinea pigs are somewhat different as, once a male ejaculates, he does not usually reinitiate copulation within the next hour (Young and Grunt, 1951) but, as in rats or rabbits, male guinea pigs can engage in a 2 nd copulation if a new female is presented (Grunt and Young, 1952;Hull and Domínguez, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%