Sexual orientation and gender identity in Canada’s “feminist” international assistance

Abstract

Canada’s Feminist International Assistance Policy (FIAP), launched in June 2017, marks the first time that sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) have been mentioned in an overarching Canadian aid policy. The inclusion of SOGI in the policy document sent an important signal to domestic and international development partners on the need to consider these sources of discrimination and marginalization. This article asks two basic research questions. First, what is the place of SOGI in Canada’s “feminist” international assistance? Second, what additional steps does Canada’s development program need to take to protect the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LGBTI) people in the Global South? Based on an analysis of official documents and secondary sources, we argue that FIAP itself sends only a weak signal about the importance of SOGI-related concerns, but Canadian foreign aid has expanded its understanding of LGBTI issues and has begun to commit dedicated resources to addressing them. Nonetheless, the initial programming (2017–2019) was channelled in an ad hoc manner and through one, major stand-alone commitment, rather than through a broader framework that would guide SOGI’s integration into Canadian programs over the long term. If serious about addressing LGBTI rights more systematically, the Canadian government needs to expand its definition of what SOGI entails and move beyond niche programming to recognize the cross-cutting dimension of LGBTI rights in foreign aid, especially in the area of sexual and reproductive health and rights.

When a “Feminist” Government Tackles Gender-Based Violence: A WPR Approach to the Speeches of Canadian Cabinet Ministers (2015–2019)

“…Most of the scholarship written on Liberal feminist government claims focus on foreign policy (Aylward and Brown, 2020; Brown, 2018; Cadesky, 2020; Robinson, 2021). Laura Parisi (2020), for example, analyzed Canada's Feminist International Assistance Policy (FIAP) using WPR.…”

Towards a transformative vision for gender and Canadian international policy: The role and impact of ‘feminist inside activists’

“…6 Other important critiques point to the erasure of gender equality from the diplomatic vocabulary under the Harper Conservative governments. 7 More recent critiques of commitments to gender equality emerge in the critical analysis of Canada's recent Feminist International Assistance Policy, which has a disproportionate focus on "women and girls" rather than gender equality, 8 lacks a clear definition of feminism, 9 has a limited approach to intersectional feminism, 10 has limited focus on sexual orientation and gender inclusion, 11 and fails to distinguish itself substantively from previous policies that have been criticized for insufficient attention to feminist and gender equality priorities. 12 While much is written on critical policy discourse, little is known about the way that gender equality and feminist foreign policy priorities are enacted and advanced in the day-to-day work of civil servants.…”

Transformative organizational and programmatic change? Civil society responses to the Canadian Feminist International Assistance Policy (FIAP)

“…Our analysis shows that FIAP's limitations in engagement with feminist practice globally and in policy formation restricts the potential for longer-term structural changes in the leadership of civil society organizations (CSOs) , how funding is received and operationalized, and what is funded and supported . More broadly, the article shows how implementing the feminist assistance policy requires further attention into how gender inequality and intersectional approaches are addressed within organizations, as well as what programmes are designed and funded (Aylward & Brown, 2020). In doing so, the article reveals both gaps and opportunities for feminist development through civil society engagement.…”