2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shading tolerance in rice is related to better light harvesting and use efficiency and grain filling rate during grain filling period

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

8
106
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
8
106
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to ambient sunlight treatment, both Y(II) and ETR were obviously raised under shade conditions, while F v /F m and NPQ showed no significant differences between ambient sunlight and shading treatment (Li et al, 2010). Wang et al(2015) declared that shade treatment greatly increased the F v /F m and reduced the ETR, which may be attributed to the decrease in excitation capture efficiency. The Y(II), qP and NPQ values showed significant differences resulting from the use of different cultivars (Wang et al, 2015).…”
Section: Different Responses To Low Light Intensity In Chlorophyll Flmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to ambient sunlight treatment, both Y(II) and ETR were obviously raised under shade conditions, while F v /F m and NPQ showed no significant differences between ambient sunlight and shading treatment (Li et al, 2010). Wang et al(2015) declared that shade treatment greatly increased the F v /F m and reduced the ETR, which may be attributed to the decrease in excitation capture efficiency. The Y(II), qP and NPQ values showed significant differences resulting from the use of different cultivars (Wang et al, 2015).…”
Section: Different Responses To Low Light Intensity In Chlorophyll Flmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Wang et al(2015) declared that shade treatment greatly increased the F v /F m and reduced the ETR, which may be attributed to the decrease in excitation capture efficiency. The Y(II), qP and NPQ values showed significant differences resulting from the use of different cultivars (Wang et al, 2015). In our present experiment, the dynamic change in chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics showed a close correlation with the different cultivars of the two maize NILs.…”
Section: Different Responses To Low Light Intensity In Chlorophyll Flmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variation in rice genotypes response against low irradiation has been shown in several studies (Demao and Xia 2003;Sopandie et al 2003;Wang et al 2015;Wang et al 2016). Reduction in photosynthetic rate caused by shading has been shown lower in tolerant genotypes compared to sensitive genotypes (Demao and Xia 2003;Wang et al 2015). The response was associated with the activity of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBPCO) in which the reduction of the RuBPCO activities in tolerant cultivar was smaller than sensitive cultivar (Demao and Xia 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reduction in light intensity interrupt photosynthetic activities, decrease plant growth and biomass which ultimately affect grain yield (Sopandie et al 2003, Liu et al 2014Wang et al 2015). Variation in rice genotypes response against low irradiation has been shown in several studies (Demao and Xia 2003;Sopandie et al 2003;Wang et al 2015;Wang et al 2016). Reduction in photosynthetic rate caused by shading has been shown lower in tolerant genotypes compared to sensitive genotypes (Demao and Xia 2003;Wang et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation