Shared decision making and patients satisfaction with strabismus care—a pilot study

Abstract

Background Strabismus is a complex disease that has various treatment approaches each with its own advantages and drawbacks. In this context, shared decisions making (SDM) is a communication process with the provider sharing all the relevant treatment alternatives, all the benefits, and risks of each procedure, while the patient shares all the preferences and values regarding his/her choices. In that way, SDM is a bidirectional process that goes beyond the typical informed consent. Therefore, it is known a little of the extent to which SDM influences the satisfaction with the treatment outcome along with strabismus patients. To study this correlation, an SDM-Q-9 questionnaire was provided within surgical consultations where treatment decisions were made; the SDM-Q-9 aims to assess the relationship between the post-operative patient’s satisfaction and their SMD score. Methods The study is considered a prospective observational pilot study. Eligible patients were adult patients diagnosed with strabismus, who had multiple treatment options, were given at the right of choice without being driven into a physician’s preference. Ninety-three strabismus patients were asked to fill out the SDM-Q-9 questionnaire related to their perception of SDM during the entire period of strabismus treatment. After the treatment, patients were asked to rate their satisfaction level with the surgical outcome as excellent, good, fair, and poor. Descriptive statistics and the linear regression statistical tests (Spearman, Mann Whitney U, and Kriskal–Wallis) were used as analysis tools. Results The average age of the participants was 24, where 50.6% were women. The mean SDM-Q-9 score among patients was 32 (IQR = 3). The postoperative patient satisfaction was rated as being excellent by 16 (17.2%) patients, good by 38 (40.9%), fair by 32 (34.4%), and poor by 7 patients (7.5%). Data analysis by linear regression statistical tests showed a positive correlation between the SDM-Q-9 score and the patient satisfaction related to the surgery outcome (B = 0.005, p < 0.001). Criteria in assessing patients’ satisfaction were age, gender, and strabismus type. A positive correlation between SDM and real satisfaction (r = 0.834, p < 0.01) was found with age, and no significant relationship was found while taking into consideration the responder’s gender and the strabismus type. Conclusions Assessing patient satisfaction after choosing a treatment for strabismus method helped us evaluate the gaps in constructive dialogue that would lead to a positive outcome for both patient and clinician. The correlation between the SDM process and the patients’ satisfaction with surgery outcome, adjusted by age, has been established. These findings can serve as a springboard to further communicative improvements related to the SDM process and between patients and physicians, thereby consequently leading to patients’ satisfaction raise in strabismus care. The study underlines the importance of further analysis and validation of on-ground interactions among the adolescent and adult patients and the clinicians across the strabismus management trajectory. A multicentral study and its validation will follow.

Patients' and health professionals' views on shared decision‐making in age‐related macular degeneration care: A qualitative study

“…Nonetheless, sufficient time is crucial to assimilate and become aware of received information. 20 Additionally, stress and anxiety from diagnosis and treatment, which are common emotions among patients with AMD, 21,22 can impact information retrieval even more.…”

“…Moreover, the organisation of AMD care with rapid medical treatments 15 can limit time for (repeated) information provision by health professionals, and restricts room for questions. Nonetheless, sufficient time is crucial to assimilate and become aware of received information 20 . Additionally, stress and anxiety from diagnosis and treatment, which are common emotions among patients with AMD, 21,22 can impact information retrieval even more.…”

Neuroanatomical Structures in Extraocular Muscles and Their Potential Implication in the Management of Strabismus

“…A recent study on the effect of shared decision making in adult strabismus care revealed that patients do not always understand what the different treatment options entail. Satisfaction, hence, was significantly higher among the patients who were actively included in the decision-making process [24]. Traditionally, the options fall into 2 distinct categories, nonsurgical and surgical treatment.…”

Exploring the Key Factors of Shared Decision-Making Through an Influential Network Relation Map: The Orthopedic Nurse's Perspective

“…The SDM-Q-Doc scale maintained the same wording as SDM-Q-9 and showed good internal consistency (α = 0.88). Currently, the SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc have been successfully applied in various studies in the areas of chronic kidney disease ( 24 ), otolaryngology ( 25 ), adult strabismus ( 26 ), and clavicular fracture ( 27 ).…”