Shared decision making for in‐patients with schizophrenia

Hamann, Johannes; Langer, B.; Winkler, Volker; Busch, Raymonde; Cohen, Rudolf; Leucht, Stefan; Kissling, Werner

doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2006.00798.x

Cited by 257 publications

(267 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

254

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However, in this study, there were some patients considered to be too ill by their doctors to participate in SDM and not being capable of "making reasonable decisions" (Hamann et al, 2006). Likewise psychiatrists in another survey determined certain patients (i.e.…”

Section: Factors Related To the Service Usermentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Likewise psychiatrists in another survey determined certain patients (i.e. patients in acute psychotic episode) or decisional situations like hospital admission as generally unsuitable for SDM (Hamann et al, 2006;Hamann et al, 2009). This is subsequently leading to paternalistic acting or even using pressure to patients (Quirk et al,, 2012).…”

Section: Factors Related To the Service Usermentioning

confidence: 99%

“…psychiatrists, social workers, Community Psychiatric Nurses (CPNs)) generally support SDM (Barr et al, 2016;Chong, Aslani, & Chen, 2013a;De Las Cuevas et al, , n.d.;Hamann et al, 2006;Patel, Bakken, & Ruland, n.d.;Puschner et al, 2016;Rise et al, 2013;S., 2016;Schauer, Everett, del Vecchio, & Anderson, 2007).…”

Section: Professionals' General Endorsement For Sdmmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…work therapy, future housing) to be more suitable for SDM than medical or legal decisions (Hamann et al, 2009). In addition, in Hamann´s randomized controlled trial, doctors recruited the SDM intervention group patients a week later than patients in the control group, indicating that doctors wanted to treat the most severe symptoms first, before embarking on a trial of SDM (Hamann et al, 2006).…”

Section: What Does Sdm Mean To Professionals?mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Attitudes towards shared decision making in mental health: a qualitative synthesis

Kaminskiy

Senner

Hamann

2017

MHRJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeShared Decision Making (SDM) prioritises joint deliberation between practitioner and service user, and a respect for service-users' experiential knowledge, values and preferences.. This article reviews the existing literature pertaining to key stakeholders' attitudes towards SDM in mental health. It examines whether perceived barriers and facilitators differ by group (e.g. service user, psychiatrist, nurse, social worker) and includes views of what facilitates and hinders the process for service users and practitioners. MethodologyThis review adopts the principles of a qualitative research synthesis. A key word search of research published between 1990 and 2016 was undertaken. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies were included. Findings43 papers were included and several themes identified for service user and practitioner perspectives. Both practitioners and service users see SDM as an ethical imperative, and both groups highlight the need to be flexible in implementing shared decision making, suggesting it is context dependent. A range of challenges and barriers are presented by both practitioners and service users reflecting complex contextual and cultural features within which interactions in mental health take place. There were qualitative differences in what service users and practitioners describe as preventing or enabling SDM. The differences highlighted point towards different challenges and priorities in SDM for service users and practitioners. Originality / ValueThe presentation of nuanced views and attitudes that practitioners and service users hold represent an important and under reported area and offer insight into the reasons for the gap between idealised policy and actual practice of SDM in mental health settings.

show abstract

Section: Factors Related To the Service Usermentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Factors Related To the Service Usermentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Professionals' General Endorsement For Sdmmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: What Does Sdm Mean To Professionals?mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Attitudes towards shared decision making in mental health: a qualitative synthesis

Kaminskiy

Senner

Hamann

2017

MHRJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Results did not support the hypothesis that brief patient education would be superior to standard of care; it would therefore be unlikely to improve adherence. Hamann et al 2006 Inpatients with schizophrenia in 12 hospital wards were randomly assigned either to a shared decisionmaking intervention or to a control group. Participants in the intervention group were given psychoeducational material, completed a booklet, and participated in treatment planning meetings.…”

Section: (22 In Interventionmentioning

confidence: 99%