Shear Bond Strength of Composite Repair System to Bilayered Zirconia Using Different Surface Treatments (In Vitro Study)

Abstract

<jats:p>Objective: the study is aimed to evaluate the effect of different surface treatment methods on shear bond strength between composite repair system and both of zirconia core and veneering porcelain and analyze the mode of failure between composite repair and ceramic surface. Material and methods: 40 Ceramic discs were fabricated with diameter of 7mm and 3mm thickness and divided according to material into two groups, Zirconia core discs (n = 20) and veneering porcelain discs (n = 20). Specimens were thermocycled and then each group was subdivided according to surface treatment method into 4 equal sub groups (n = 5) ,control subgroup I air abrasion, subgroup II Cojet, subgroup III laser, subgroup IV combination of air abrasion and laser surface treatment. Composite blocks were built up and polymerized on the surface of the specimens and shear bond strength of composite to each specimen was tested using a universal testing machine and mode of failure was evaluated using stereomicroscope. Results: Regardless of ceramic type; there was a statistically significant difference between surface treatments. Cojet recorded the highest mean shear bond strength. Laser showed the highest prevalence of adhesive failure. Porcelain + Cojet showed the highest prevalence of cohesive failure. Conclusion: Cojet surface treatment provided superior shear bond strength regardless of the ceramic type whether zirconia or porcelain. Porcelain provided superior shear bond strength values in comparison to zirconia regardless of the surface treatment method tested. Porcelain showed higher percentage of cohesive failure that while the mode of failure in zirconia was most commonly adhesive.KEYWORDS Laser; Porcelain repair; Zirconia repair. </jats:p>

Influence of Optional Crystallization Firing on the Adhesion of Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate before and after Aging

“…Although the ZLS group without crystallization presents higher values of µSBS, the ZLS group with additional crystallization has superior mechanical resistance, which can affect its clinical application [33]. Additionally, it is worth mentioning that only one aging method was employed, without other parameters for adhesive interface degradation such as mechanical fatigue [24], pH variation, biofilm formation, or surface treatment [37]. The samples were ideally treated, and there were no contaminants on the surface.…”

Intraoral Repair of Dental Ceramics Using Er,Cr:YSGG Laser: Review

“…In a similar study made by Polat, Tokar et al 2021 they reported the highest bond strength for 100% porcelain and mixed were in the control group with diamond bur with 16.76 MPa and 16.6 Mpa respectively. Baiomy et al 2020 , had four groups for surface treatment air abrasion, Cojet, Er,Cr:YSGG laser, and mixed group (Cojet and laser), in their study they revealed that there was a significant difference between the groups(SBS) highest bond strength was in Cojet group and the lowest value was in the laser group. These results are in accordance with a study made by Sarac et al 2013.…”

Comparison of shear bond strength and color reproduction of two different high-performance polymers veneered with two different thicknesses of resin composite: an in-vitro study

“…In the present study, direct composite veneers were applied on a core of BioHPP &PEKK with two different thicknesses. Resin composite material has many benefits when used as a veneering material, such as improving the esthetics of restorations made of opaque white polymers to a degree that could mimic the neighboring tooth structure, being less abrasive to natural teeth, being bio-compatible with surrounding tissues and could be easily repaired in clinics or labs [14].…”