1981
DOI: 10.1070/im1981v016n03abeh001322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shimura Integrals of Cusp Forms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
4

Year Published

1991
1991
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
19
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way, modular symbols of higher weight can be interpreted as rational homology classes of middle dimension of Kuga-Sato varieties: cf. [Sh1]- [Sh3].…”
Section: Modular Symbols and Periods Of Modular Formsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this way, modular symbols of higher weight can be interpreted as rational homology classes of middle dimension of Kuga-Sato varieties: cf. [Sh1]- [Sh3].…”
Section: Modular Symbols and Periods Of Modular Formsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed analysis of singularities performed in [Sh2], [Sh3] shows that the map f → ω induces an isomorphism of the space of cusp forms of weight 2r with the space of holomorphic volume forms on an appropriate smooth projective KugaSato variety. (As I have already remarked in the Introduction, it would be useful to replace it by the base extension (M 1,2r−2 ) X Γ .…”
Section: Theorem (I) Ifmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ad -bc = n, d -1 -c--0 mod N). For every n > 1 we define Hecke [9] and [17) proved (see [7]) in the more general setting of any subgroup r C SL2 (Z) of finite index (instead of rl (N)) and the setting of correspondences defined as double cosets (instead of the concrete Hecke or diamond operators).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes an algebraic proof of the presentation of modular symbols in terms of Manin symbols. Thus, we avoid the use of the technically rather difficult paper [13], which is present in all the published treatments known to the author (e.g. [11], [14]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%