Shock-driven dispersal of a corrugated finite-thickness particle layer

Abstract

A research area emerging in the multiphase flow community is the study of shock-driven multiphase instability (SDMI), a gas–particle analog of the traditional fluid-fluid Richtmyer–Meshkov instability (RMI). In this work, we study the interaction of planar air shocks with corrugated glass particle curtains through the use of numerical simulations with an Eulerian–Lagrangian approach. One objective of this study is to compare the simulated particle curtains to a comparable set of shock tube experiments performed to analyze traditional RMI of a gas curtain. The simulations are set to match the experimental shock Mach numbers and perturbation wavelengths (3.6 and 7.2 mm) while also matching the Atwood number of the experiments to the multiphase Atwood number of the simulations. Varying particle diameters are tested in the simulations to explore the impact of particle diameter on the evolution of the particle curtain. This simulation setup allows for a one-to-one comparison between RMI and SDMI under comparable conditions while also allowing for a separate study into the validity of the use of the multiphase Atwood number to compare the single-phase and multiphase instabilities. In particular, we show that the comparison depends on the diameter of the particles (thus, dependent on the Stokes number of the flow). A second objective of this study is to analyze the effect of the initial particle volume fraction on the evolution of the curtain and the behavior of the instability. This is done through analyzing the effect of the multiphase terms of the vorticity evolution equation on the vorticity deposition in SDMI. Also discussed is the effect of the particle diameter on the multiphase generation terms as well as in the baroclinic vorticity generation term in SDMI as the shock passes over the curtain.

Hydrodynamic instabilities of two successive slow/fast interfaces induced by a weak shock

“…planar, cylindrical and spherical geometries) and reshocks have different and significant influences on the hydrodynamic instabilities of the multiple interfaces (Mikaelian 1996, 2005; de Frahan, Movahed & Johnsen 2015; Li, Samtaney & Wheatley 2018; Qiao & Lan 2021; Ouellet et al. 2022).…”

“…It was found that the initial perturbations of the two interfaces, the number of interfaces, the geometry of the computational domain (i.e. planar, cylindrical and spherical geometries) and reshocks have different and significant influences on the hydrodynamic instabilities of the multiple interfaces (Mikaelian 1996(Mikaelian , 2005de Frahan, Movahed & Johnsen 2015;Li, Samtaney & Wheatley 2018;Qiao & Lan 2021;Ouellet et al 2022).…”