2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shore platform downwearing in eastern Canada: Micro-tidal Gaspé, Québec

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Porter et al (2010a) concluded that there was no apparent relationship between downwearing rates and elevation at Scots Bay or Burntcoat Head, but this was not tested statistically nor were trends analysed within the upper, central and lower portions of the intertidal zone. Porter et al (2010b) found no relationship between downwearing rates and elevation at Mont Louis, where the platform surface is irregular but essentially quasi-horizontal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Porter et al (2010a) concluded that there was no apparent relationship between downwearing rates and elevation at Scots Bay or Burntcoat Head, but this was not tested statistically nor were trends analysed within the upper, central and lower portions of the intertidal zone. Porter et al (2010b) found no relationship between downwearing rates and elevation at Mont Louis, where the platform surface is irregular but essentially quasi-horizontal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Rates of downwearing for the argillaceous rocks on the upper intertidal shore platform at Mont Louis are faster, for approximately the same elevations, than in the sea water experiments. This has been attributed to weaker rocks having been selected for the experiments than the harder outcrops on which most of the TMEMs were installed (Porter et al, 2010b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This model is constructed on the premise that the lithology is so vulnerable to abrasive processes and subaerial weathering that the platform surface is easily lowered (e.g. Porter et al 2010). This facilitates wave propagation across the platform, allowing for waves to attack the landward cliff and cause erosion.…”
Section: Rocky Coast Evolution Models Under Uplift Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is represented as a positive link between intertidal exposure time and weathering rate. Downwearing of the intertidal platform, in the absence of abrasive material and bioerosional organisms, has been attributed generally to weathering and removal of the fine-grained debris by waves (Porter et al 2010). Most of the mechanical downwearing of the submerged platform is due to breaking waves, the downwearing erosion rate has been often conceptualized as a decaying function of water depth (Sunamura 1992;Trenhaile 2005).…”
Section: Feedback Loop Structure Of Cliff Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%