Short communication on the 14th Symposium on Second Language Writing (SSLW 2015) learning to write for academic purposes: Advancing theory, research and practice

Kakh, Samira Y.; Bitchener, John

doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2016.03.001

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The analysis of co-citation network mapping revealed that the key nodes with high co-citation frequency and high mediating centrality are Bitchener (2008Bitchener ( , 2012aBitchener ( , 2012b, Bitchener and Knoch (2008, 2010a, 2010b, Kakh and Bitchener (2016), Ellis et al (2008), Ferris (2010), Kang and Han (2015), Liu and Brown (2015), Zheng and Yu (2018) (Figure 4). Most of Bitchener's studies are empirical studies comparing experimental and control groups.…”

Section: Analysis Of Co-citation Referencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research Trends of Written Corrective Feedback in L2 Writing: A Bibliometric Analysis

Miao

Chang

2023

Sage Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Written corrective feedback in Second Language Writing is one of the most important parts in L2 Acquisition and Language Teaching. CiteSpace is a convenient and effective bibliometric analysis tool which is widely used by researchers to explore the development tends of a certain field. The Web of Science core collection database was used as the primary source for data collection. There were 272 effective articles were selected from 2001 to 2021. The hot research topics in recent 20 years and emerging trends were showed. It was found that the research of written corrective feedback has entered a period of rapid development after the accumulation of basic knowledge in the early stage. Many empirical studies have been carried out. The distribution, cooperation, development trends and hotpots of current research are presented through visual map analysis in this study. In the future, the written corrective feedback research could try to concentrate on the psychological process and feedback providers, and it is also suggested to combine interdisciplinary knowledge such as education, psychology, neurology, etc., and use new research and measurement methods to promote the development of written corrective feedback.

show abstract