Short-term association between personal exposure to noise and heart rate variability: The RECORD MultiSensor Study

Aarbaoui, Tarik El; Méline, Julie; Brondeel, Ruben; Chaix, Basile

doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2017.08.031

Cited by 49 publications

(52 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However, it is not completely clear yet what the effects or the mechanisms of musical sounds are on the human body. Thus, it has been observed that exposure to noise increases BP and HR ( Holand et al, 1999 ; Björ et al, 2007 ; Raggam et al, 2007 ; Goyal et al, 2010 ; Lee et al, 2010 ; Croy et al, 2013 ; Kraus et al, 2013 ; Osiris et al, 2014 ; Sim et al, 2015 ; Gallasch et al, 2016 ; El Aarbaoui et al, 2017 ), whereas music evokes emotions and has effects on mood, memory, stress levels, and anxiety. The effects of noise have also been seen on several of the body’s systems, such as nervous, cardiovascular, respiratory, and endocrine, where it can influence physiological variables, such as respiration, HR, BP, and many more ( Koelsch and Jancke, 2015 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Different Types of Sounds and Their Relationship With the Electrocardiographic Signals and the Cardiovascular System – Review

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: For some time now, the effects of sound, noise, and music on the human body have been studied. However, despite research done through time, it is still not completely clear what influence, interaction, and effects sounds have on human body. That is why it is necessary to conduct new research on this topic. Thus, in this paper, a systematic review is undertaken in order to integrate research related to several types of sound, both pleasant and unpleasant, specifically noise and music. In addition, it includes as much research as possible to give stakeholders a more general vision about relevant elements regarding methodologies, study subjects, stimulus, analysis, and experimental designs in general. This study has been conducted in order to make a genuine contribution to this area and to perhaps to raise the quality of future research about sound and its effects over ECG signals.Methods: This review was carried out by independent researchers, through three search equations, in four different databases, including: engineering, medicine, and psychology. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied and studies published between 1999 and 2017 were considered. The selected documents were read and analyzed independently by each group of researchers and subsequently conclusions were established between all of them.Results: Despite the differences between the outcomes of selected studies, some common factors were found among them. Thus, in noise studies where both BP and HR increased or tended to increase, it was noted that HRV (HF and LF/HF) changes with both sound and noise stimuli, whereas GSR changes with sound and musical stimuli. Furthermore, LF also showed changes with exposure to noise.Conclusion: In many cases, samples displayed a limitation in experimental design, and in diverse studies, there was a lack of a control group. There was a lot of variability in the presented stimuli providing a wide overview of the effects they could produce in humans. In the listening sessions, there were numerous examples of good practice in experimental design, such as the use of headphones and comfortable positions for study subjects, while the listening sessions lasted 20 min in most of the studies.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Different Types of Sounds and Their Relationship With the Electrocardiographic Signals and the Cardiovascular System – Review

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…1 Estimate and 95% CI adjusted for cumulative of cycling day (n = 1 to 5), period of day (AM or PM), distance cycled during the period (kilometres), duration of the cycling activity (hours), number of repeated 5 min RR intervals for the rest period (n = 1 to 8), and the participant. 2 Bayes factor (BF) versus 0. 3 Interaction between total inhaled of PM 2.5 and participants 2 to 4 in comparison with the participant 1 as reference.…”

Section: Effects Of Particulate Matter and Noise Assessed Simultaneouslymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Traffic-related air and noise pollution exposure is recognized as one of the major public health challenges of the 21st century. It is well-known that exposure to air and noise pollution contributes to detrimental effects on respiratory and cardiovascular systems [1][2][3]. These exposures are indeed a major contributor to increased length of in-hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality associated with chronic diseases [4][5][6].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Various studies have also shown that the autonomic nervous system regulates different functions of the body, such as breathing, gas exchange, blood pressure, heart muscles, etc., and thus allows the maintenance of the internal homeostasis of the organism [8,9]. Heart rate variability can hence be used to measure short-term health effects, thereby showcasing how air and noise pollution disrupts the autonomous cardiac function [2,10]. While both air and noise pollution co-occur in the same environment and alter the cardiac autonomic function, their health endpoint resemblance may reflect either their interaction or one acting as a confounding/effect modifier on the outcome [3].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For instance, a recent study has shown that during rush hours in Montreal, cyclists had 3.7 times higher inhaled doses of nitrogen dioxide than motorists, and they were also exposed to higher levels of noise (1.9 dB(A)) [14]. To this end, several studies have found an association between exposure to traffic-related air pollution [16][17][18] and exposure to noise [2,3,19,20] and their personal impact on heart function. To our best knowledge, there is nonetheless a scarcity of studies in the scientific literature that explore whether and how the simultaneous traffic-related air and noise pollution exposure disrupts the heart function in real-world settings.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Short-Term Impact of Traffic-Related Particulate Matter and Noise Exposure on Cardiac Function

Buregeya

Apparicio

2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Exposure to traffic-related air pollution and noise exposure contributes to detrimental effects on cardiac function, but the underlying short-term effects related to their simultaneous personal exposure remain uncertain. The aim is to assess the impact of total inhaled dose of particulate matter and total noise exposure on the variations of electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters between pre-cycling and post-cycling periods. Mid-June 2019, we collected four participants’ personal exposure data related to traffic-related noise and particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10) as well as ECG parameters. Several Bayesian linear models were built to examine a potential association between air pollutants and noise exposure and ECG parameters: heart rate (HR), standard deviation of the normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN), percentage of successive RR intervals that differ by more than 50 ms (pNN50), root mean square of successive RR interval differences (rMSSD), low-frequency power (LF), high-frequency power (HF), and ratio of low- to high-frequency power (LF/HF). We analyzed in total 255 5-min segments of RR intervals. We observed that per 1 µg increase in cumulative inhaled dose of PM2.5 was associated with 0.48 (95% CI: 0.22; 15.61) increase in variation of the heart rate, while one percent of total noise dose was associated with 0.49 (95% CI: 0.17; 0.83) increase in variation of heart rate between corresponding periods. Personal noise exposure was no longer significant once the PM2.5 was introduced in the whole model, whilst coefficients of the latter that were significant previously remained unchanged. Short-term exposure to traffic-related air and noise pollution did not, however, have an impact on heart rate variability.

show abstract

Human Response to Traffic Noise: Insights from Psychophysiological Signals

Manohare,

Elangovan,

Parida

2024

Handbook of Vibroacoustics, Noise and Harshness

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Short-term association between personal exposure to noise and heart rate variability: The RECORD MultiSensor Study

Cited by 49 publications

References 42 publications

Different Types of Sounds and Their Relationship With the Electrocardiographic Signals and the Cardiovascular System – Review

Different Types of Sounds and Their Relationship With the Electrocardiographic Signals and the Cardiovascular System – Review

Short-Term Impact of Traffic-Related Particulate Matter and Noise Exposure on Cardiac Function

Human Response to Traffic Noise: Insights from Psychophysiological Signals

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About