2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-2323-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-term functional and clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction with hamstrings autograft: transtibial versus anteromedial portal technique

Abstract: Therapeutic study, Level II.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite significant differences in tunnel positioning, no differences in clinical outcome measures were observed between our groups. Some studies indicate that TP drilling of the femoral tunnel improves clinical outcome [23,24], while other studies do not report any obvious differences [25][26][27]. In our study, clinical outcome was assessed using subjective questionnaires, and not by objective clinical assessment of laxity, which may have moderated potential differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Despite significant differences in tunnel positioning, no differences in clinical outcome measures were observed between our groups. Some studies indicate that TP drilling of the femoral tunnel improves clinical outcome [23,24], while other studies do not report any obvious differences [25][26][27]. In our study, clinical outcome was assessed using subjective questionnaires, and not by objective clinical assessment of laxity, which may have moderated potential differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…This agrees with some of the findings by Alentorn-Geli et al [4], who demonstrated no differences in Lysholm or Tegner scores; however, they did find improved International Knee Documentation Committee scores in those undergoing an AM portal-based reconstruction. Koutras et al [27] demonstrated no differences in Lysholm scores at 6 months in patients undergoing hamstring autograft when comparing TT versus AM groups using hamstring autograft. Although are results are in agreement with some of the findings in these studies, our study was not powered to detect significant differences in this regard.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In a short-term study conducted by Koutras et al 17 , 51 patients were included and data were collected at 3 and 6 months after surgery. The AM approach group had better Lysholm scores at 3 months and better perfor-unclear whether this widening has a correlation with the clinical outcomes of ACL reconstruction.…”
Section: Clinical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%