Should Artificial Intelligence be used to support clinical ethical decision-making? A systematic review of reasons

Abstract

Background Healthcare providers have to make ethically complex clinical decisions which may be a source of stress. Researchers have recently introduced Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based applications to assist in clinical ethical decision-making. However, the use of such tools is controversial. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the reasons given in the academic literature for and against their use. Methods PubMed, Web of Science, Philpapers.org and Google Scholar were searched for all relevant publications. The resulting set of publications was title and abstract screened according to defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, resulting in 44 papers whose full texts were analysed using the Kuckartz method of qualitative text analysis. Results Artificial Intelligence might increase patient autonomy by improving the accuracy of predictions and allowing patients to receive their preferred treatment. It is thought to increase beneficence by providing reliable information, thereby, supporting surrogate decision-making. Some authors fear that reducing ethical decision-making to statistical correlations may limit autonomy. Others argue that AI may not be able to replicate the process of ethical deliberation because it lacks human characteristics. Concerns have been raised about issues of justice, as AI may replicate existing biases in the decision-making process. Conclusions The prospective benefits of using AI in clinical ethical decision-making are manifold, but its development and use should be undertaken carefully to avoid ethical pitfalls. Several issues that are central to the discussion of Clinical Decision Support Systems, such as justice, explicability or human–machine interaction, have been neglected in the debate on AI for clinical ethics so far. Trial registration This review is registered at Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/wvcs9).

Artificial Intelligence and Decision-Making in Healthcare: A Thematic Analysis of a Systematic Review of Reviews

“…One study delineated that AI has the potential to enhance patient autonomy by enabling patients to receive their treatment of choice. 32 Meanwhile, a research proposed a system that integrated AI estimations, physician's interpretation, and parents’ perspectives to support ethical treatment decisions for newborn patients; The results showed that the system had delivered personalized and customized information to different users and facilitated shared decision-making involving parents. 61 AI can help create adaptive and personalized educational software that can tailor the learning content, pace, feedback, and assessment to each individual learner.…”

Exploring the Deep Learning of Artificial Intelligence in Nursing: A Concept Analysis with Walker and Avant’s Approach

“…Implementation strategies involve collaborative efforts to align AI with nursing standards, integrate it into existing infrastructure, provide training, and ensure ethical use. These efforts promise to enhance patient care, streamline work ows, and address ethical, legal, and societal concerns, marking a signi cant advancement in nursing practice [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46].…”

“…This holistic approach ensures adherence to guidelines and maximizes e ciency and convenience, leveraging the support of family members for an optimal caregiving experience [17]. The deep-learning prediction model and the resultant risk strati cation score may prove helpful in clinical decision-making under time-sensitive and resourceconstrained environments [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47].…”

Personalized risk reduction of hiv plans with artificial intelligence: a narrative review

“…Ethical Decision Support: Healthcare professionals and contact tracers can make ethical decisions concerning contact tracing and alerts with the support of AI, which offers moral insights and recommendations. When handling sensitive health data, it can help with difficult ethical decisions such as determining the appropriate level of notification and disclosure to individuals who may have been in contact with someone with HIV [51]…”