2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.01.163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Side branch occlusion after bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation: Thickness of the scaffold or large plaque burden? Another building block in the comprehension of this complication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the case of SB diameter ≥ 2 mm, the high crossing profile of the device in association to the (large) plaque burden may determine SBO [4][5], therefore the interventional cardiologist needs to have an indication about the adequate treatment in the case of SBC or residual ostium stenosis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the case of SB diameter ≥ 2 mm, the high crossing profile of the device in association to the (large) plaque burden may determine SBO [4][5], therefore the interventional cardiologist needs to have an indication about the adequate treatment in the case of SBC or residual ostium stenosis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%