2013
DOI: 10.1002/jcla.21543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significance of Antibodies Against the Native Ribosomal P Protein Complex and Recombinant P0, P1, and P2 Proteins in the Diagnosis of Chinese Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Abstract: Based on these results, antibodies against ribosomal P proteins are important complementary parameters to anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm, and should be considered for inclusion in the classification criteria for SLE. The diagnostic value of anti-Rib-P0/P1/P2 is diagnostically superior to that of anti-Rib-P(C).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The very high titre of anti-ribosomal P antibodies in full-blown psychosis and the pronounced fall of these antibodies thereafter, concomitant with reaching clinical remission, strongly support the concept of anti-ribosomal P antibodies causing lupus psychosis, as found in an animal model [18,19] and in the majority of clinical studies [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. As already described above, intrathecal anti-ribosomal P antibodies effect psychiatric disease manifestations in mice, consistent with their specific binding pattern.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The very high titre of anti-ribosomal P antibodies in full-blown psychosis and the pronounced fall of these antibodies thereafter, concomitant with reaching clinical remission, strongly support the concept of anti-ribosomal P antibodies causing lupus psychosis, as found in an animal model [18,19] and in the majority of clinical studies [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. As already described above, intrathecal anti-ribosomal P antibodies effect psychiatric disease manifestations in mice, consistent with their specific binding pattern.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…These autoantibodies are directed against three highly conserved phosphorylated P proteins [8]. Auto-antibodies recognizing the ribosomal P protein (aRP), first characterized in 1985 [9], are highly specific for SLE [10,11] and are associated with disease activity and neuropsychiatric events in SLE [12]. High levels of anti-ribosomal P antibodies have been found in psychotic SLE patients [13][14][15] and in major depressive/psychotic SLE patients [10,16], although not all studies have seen such association [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anti–galectin 3 antibody levels were also higher in patients with skin lesions than in those without skin lesions, but the difference was not significant (Figures C and D). In terms of the specificity of the 2 antibodies among SLE, DM, and SSc, levels of anti–RPLP antibodies including anti‐RPLP0 have already been shown to be a specific and effective measurement in diagnosing SLE (). Therefore, we investigated whether anti–galectin 3 antibody levels were significantly higher in SLE patients, especially those with lupus lesions, than in patients with DM or SSc.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the subgroup analyses of ethnicity, a significant association of anti-P antibody with arthritis was found in the AfricanAmerican group (OR 3.79, 95% CI 1.40-10.30, P ¼ 0.009), but not in the Caucasian (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.66-1.66, P ¼ 0.99) or Asian (OR 1.41, 95% CI 0.79-2.51, P ¼ 0.25) groups. The heterogeneity was relatively low in European (I 2 ¼ 0%, P Heterogeneity ¼ 0.48) and African-American groups (I 2 ¼ 34%, P Heterogeneity ¼ 0.22), but was high Haddouk et al 45 * * * * --* * * 7 Gerli et al 23 * * * * * -* * * 8 Olesin´ska et al 46 * * -* ----* 4 Briani et al 47 * * * * --* -* 6 Guo et al 48 * * -* ----* 4 Wu et al 49 * * * * ----* 5 Ghirardello et al 17 * * * * --* * * 7 Tzioufas et al 50 * * * * --* * * 7 Massardo et al 36 * * * * ----* 5 Barkhudarova et al 51 * * * * -* * -* 7 Li et al 13 * * * * -* * * * 8 Aldar et al 52 * * * --* * * * 7 Nojima et al 53 * * * * --* --5 Yalaoui et al 54 * * -* --* -* 5 Chandran et al 55 * * * * --* -* 6 Yang et al 56 * * -* ----* 4 C1: comparability1 -adjustment for disease course; C2: comparability2 -adjustment for other factors; O1: outcome1 -assessment of outcome; O2: outcome2 -adequate follow up period for outcome of interest; O3: outcome3 -adequacy of follow up of cohorts; S1: selection1 -giving the eligible criteria, sources and methods of participants; S2: selection2 -describing the characteristics of participants; S3: selection3 -defining the exposure-explicit standard for positive result; S4: demonstrating no outcome of interest at start of study.…”
Section: Association Of Anti-p Antibody With Arthritismentioning
confidence: 96%