2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2004.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significance of predischarge BNP on one-year outcome in decompensated heart failure—comparative study with echo-Doppler indexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been reported previously both in the hospital [6][7][8][14][15][16] as well as in the ambulatory setting [17][18][19]. Our data confirm these findings, showing that NTproBNP three months after discharge is a better prognostic marker than NT-proBNP at discharge.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This has been reported previously both in the hospital [6][7][8][14][15][16] as well as in the ambulatory setting [17][18][19]. Our data confirm these findings, showing that NTproBNP three months after discharge is a better prognostic marker than NT-proBNP at discharge.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In this regard, the predischarge BNP levels appear to be more predictive of rehospitalization than the commonly performed measurements on admission to the hospital [6,7]. However, the optimal levels able to stratify risk of rehospitalization and other important outcomes are still not known and more clinical research is awaited.…”
Section: Biomarkers Of Neurohormonal Activationmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Acute MI [8,14,30] or historical MI [9,22] were associated with increased concentrations of B-type natriuretic peptides. However, there was no difference between patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and historical MI [31]. Stable angina was not associated with a difference in Btype natriuretic peptides in one study [14] that included hypertensive patients, but was positively associated in patients who also had non ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) ACS [27].…”
Section: Cardiac Diseasementioning
confidence: 96%