2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.06.254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-incision surgery has higher cost with equivalent pain and quality of life scores compared to multiple-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomized blinded comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…SILC achieves a better surgical outcome with less parietal trauma and improved cosmesis, equally as well in decreased incisional pain, faster functional recovery, and shorter hospital stays, with no gain of postoperative complications when compared to TMLC [13,15,24,25]. Ultimately, higher patient satisfaction was revealed, especially for young female individuals and those who cared more about cosmesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…SILC achieves a better surgical outcome with less parietal trauma and improved cosmesis, equally as well in decreased incisional pain, faster functional recovery, and shorter hospital stays, with no gain of postoperative complications when compared to TMLC [13,15,24,25]. Ultimately, higher patient satisfaction was revealed, especially for young female individuals and those who cared more about cosmesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This advantage, however, should be discussed taking into account the higher costs with equivalent quality of life evaluations for LCSUI [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cet avantage doit être discuté en tenant compte du coût plus élevé lié à cette technique permettant d'obtenir des scores de qualité de vie équivalents [22]. Cet avantage doit être discuté en tenant compte du coût plus élevé lié à cette technique permettant d'obtenir des scores de qualité de vie équivalents [22].…”
Section: Discussionunclassified