“…As shown in Figure a, Ce 1 –W 1 /TiO 2 possesses abundant strong Lewis acid sites, characteristic of the bands at 1172–1240 cm –1 , ,, and the Lewis acid sites have also been reported to be active sites of CeO 2 -based , or traditional V–W/TiO 2 SCR catalysts. − After comparing the DRIFT spectrum of Ce 1 –W 1 /TiO 2 to those of W 1 /TiO 2 , Ce 1 /TiO 2 , and TiO 2 , it is convincing that the W anchoring leads to the generation of abundant strong Lewis acid sites on Ce 1 –W 1 /TiO 2 , similar to the previously reported results on Ce–W/TiO 2 . , Only Lewis acid sites are observed on the surface of Ce 1 –W 1 /TiO 2 and W 1 /TiO 2 , indicating that the monotungstate species are predominant on these catalysts, consistent with the results in STEM. Although Ce 1 –W 1 /TiO 2 and Ce 1 /TiO 2 presented a similar CeO 4 tetragonal motif (Figure S7), Brønsted acid sites characteristics of the broad bands at 1386–1480 cm –1 are observed on Ce 1 /TiO 2 ,, but are absent on the surfaces of Ce 1 –W 1 /TiO 2 , also implicating the existence of the synergy within Ce 1 –W 1 atom pairs.…”