Single-operator cholangioscopy for the extraction of cystic duct stones (with video)

Sepe, Paul S.; Berzin, Tyler M.; Sanaka, Sirish; Patel, Nirav J.; Sawhney, Mandeep S.; Chuttani, Ram; Pleskow, Douglas K.

doi:10.1016/j.gie.2011.08.025

Cited by 17 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Baseline characteristics of the studies are presented in Table . Fourteen studies reported procedure duration . Median duration was 68.7 min, ranging from 30 min to 165 min.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Figure 1 shows the PRISMA flow diagram of selected studies. Of the 24 studies evaluated, 13 were carried out in America, 12,14,15,[17][18][19]21,22,25,26,30,31,35 seven in Asia, 13,20,23,24,27,29,34 three in Europe, 16,28,33 and one was a multinational study spanning America, Asia, and Europe. 32 Ten studies were multicenter.…”

Section: Description Of Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…12,14,16,19,22,23,25,30,32,33 Two studies were randomized controlled trials (RCT), 26,35 and the remaining 22 were cohort studies. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] Seven of the cohort studies were prospective, [13][14][15]23,[27][28][29] and the remaining 15 were retrospective. 12,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22]24,25,…”

Section: Description Of Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] Seven of the cohort studies were prospective, [13][14][15]23,[27][28][29] and the remaining 15 were retrospective. 12,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22]24,25,[30][31][32][33][34] Four studies had a control group for comparison. 20,26,31,35 Sixteen studies reported on SpyGlass, [12][13][14]…”

Section: Description Of Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Single‐operator peroral cholangioscope in treating difficult biliary stones: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Zheng

Wei

Tang

et al. 2018

Digestive Endoscopy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Aim Current evidence supporting the utility of single‐operator peroral cholangioscope (SOPOC) in the management of difficult bile duct stones is limited. We conducted the present systematic review and meta‐analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SOPOC in treating difficult bile duct stones. Methods We searched studies up to April 2018, using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Quality assessment of the studies was completed with the Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale. Main outcomes were complete stone clearance rate, single‐session stone clearance rate, number of endoscopic sessions needed for stone clearance, and adverse events. We calculated the pooled estimates with random‐effects models. Potential publication bias was assessed. Results Twenty‐four studies involving 2786 patients met the inclusion criteria. Pooled proportion of patients with complete stone clearance was 94.3% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 90.2–97.5%). Single‐session stone clearance was achieved in 71.1% (95% CI: 62.1–79.5%) of the pooled patients. Pooled number of sessions needed for stone clearance was 1.26 (95% CI: 1.17–1.34%). Pooled adverse event rate was 6.1% (95% CI: 3.8–8.7%). Potential publication bias was detected but had no significant influence on the results. Conclusions Single‐operator peroral cholangioscope is an effective and safe treatment for difficult bile duct stones when conventional methods have failed. More randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm the results.

show abstract

“…Baseline characteristics of the studies are presented in Table . Fourteen studies reported procedure duration . Median duration was 68.7 min, ranging from 30 min to 165 min.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Description Of Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Description Of Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Description Of Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Single‐operator peroral cholangioscope in treating difficult biliary stones: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Zheng

Wei

Tang

et al. 2018

Digestive Endoscopy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Compared with the traditional cholangiopancreatoscopy system, SOCS has many advantages, which mainly stem from its convenient insertion into the biliary tract because of its tapered tip, favorable visualization by virtue of a 120° digital view field, and newly added injection and suction functions through a two‐port adaptor . Therefore, SOCS has been successfully applied to the diagnosis and therapy of biliary and pancreatic diseases (such as intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm), the removal of complex CBD stones …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%