2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-3294-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single- or Two-stage Revision for Infected Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review of the Literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
108
0
8

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
108
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Although one-stage exchange has shown promise [5,18,21,23,33], the efficacy of this treatment in cases of chronic infection and resistant organisms and the need for long-term intravenous antibiotic management may limit its use to selected cases. Treatment of both chronically infected cemented THA and late-onset acute infections in well-ingrown cementless THA using a single-stage revision combined with direct catheter infusion of antibiotics into the joint was successful in this small series, both among patients with antibiotic-sensitive and -resistant organisms; no severe complications were attributable to the use the intraarticular antibiotic infusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although one-stage exchange has shown promise [5,18,21,23,33], the efficacy of this treatment in cases of chronic infection and resistant organisms and the need for long-term intravenous antibiotic management may limit its use to selected cases. Treatment of both chronically infected cemented THA and late-onset acute infections in well-ingrown cementless THA using a single-stage revision combined with direct catheter infusion of antibiotics into the joint was successful in this small series, both among patients with antibiotic-sensitive and -resistant organisms; no severe complications were attributable to the use the intraarticular antibiotic infusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An established technique for the treatment of chronic infection in THA is generally considered to consist of two-stage revision with an interim antibiotic-loaded polymethylmethacrylate spacer to deliver antibiotics to the local area combined with intravenous antibiotics to deliver antibiotics systemically [3,24,33,38]. By contrast, singlestage revision procedures performed with or without cement fixation also are used [5,33,58], and no clear evidence exists that two-stage revision yields superior results to single-stage protocols [5,14,18,21,23,33,58].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As there are no studies directly comparing the success rate of one-versus two-stage exchange arthroplasty [7], there is a need to conduct randomized controlled trials comparing one-to two-stage exchange arthroplasty in similar patient populations.…”
Section: Corr Insightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients treated with one-stage exchange arthroplasty demonstrated high functional outcome scores, high success of infection eradication, and cost savings for undergoing only one surgical procedure in specific patient populations [6,9]. While two-stage exchange arthroplasty for treating PJI has been widely reported, fewer studies report the results of one-stage exchange arthroplasty, and the success rate of surgery is variable [7,8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%