2005
DOI: 10.1021/cr0505627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-Reference ab Initio Methods for the Calculation of Excited States of Large Molecules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

57
2,687
3
10

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,527 publications
(2,757 citation statements)
references
References 143 publications
57
2,687
3
10
Order By: Relevance
“…43,44,85 TDDFT, pure as well as hybrid, increasingly underestimates excitation energies of conjugated systems with increasing chain length. 42,45,46,[86][87][88] Since high level ab initio methods become prohibitively expensive for long chain cations, TDHF and TDDFT will be tested here for excited-state calculations on polyene cations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…43,44,85 TDDFT, pure as well as hybrid, increasingly underestimates excitation energies of conjugated systems with increasing chain length. 42,45,46,[86][87][88] Since high level ab initio methods become prohibitively expensive for long chain cations, TDHF and TDDFT will be tested here for excited-state calculations on polyene cations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equilibrium structures of D35 (S 0 ) and D35 + (D 0 ) were optimized using the B3LYP functional 30 and a 6-31G(d) basis set. Time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) 31,32 was applied to these geometries for calculating the lowest 5 singlet (neutral D35) and lowest 20 doublet (D35 + ) excited electronic states at vertical excitation using MPW1K 33 and B3LYP functionals in combination with a 6-31+G(d) basis set. Calculations were carried out using the Gaussian 09 package.…”
Section: Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, this presents another justification of the hybrid scheme to obtain the correct excited state curve by combining both DFT and CIS results. 8,11 However, the situation will change at short R. The error of CIS is due to the difference in the correlations on the ground and the excited electronic states. (Namely, if the correlations are the same on the two states, CIS will give the correct result.)…”
Section: Ss U C Even Though the Reduced Error Is A Desirable Feature mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its low cost mean-field level computational effort (formally scaling ~N 4 or better with respect to the system size N), TDDFT has been shown to be reliable for many chemically interesting systems. 8 However, it has a serious failure in the description of an important class of excitations. 11 TDDFT calculations must use an approximation for the exchange-correlation (xc) functional, and no xc-functional at present is known to be efficient, reliable for various systems and free from the self-interaction-error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%