“…Eighty-eight studies were excluded due to discrepancies between their primary and secondary results compared to those of this review, or because they failed to meet the established criteria for good data extraction. Therefore, 39 articles [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 ] were selected for this study ( n = 140,137) (including patients, images, and cadavers) ( Figure 1 ).…”