Single Stage Silicone Border Molded Closed Mouth Impression Technique—Part II

Solomon, E. G. R.

doi:10.1007/s13191-011-0098-1

Cited by 16 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[ 11 ] described a technique for border molding using light polymerized resin. Solomon[ 12 ] studied the single stage silicone border molded closed mouth impression technique. This study describes an active closed mouth impression technique with one stage border molding using putty silicone material as a substitute for low fusing compound.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative evaluation of reproducibility of peripheral tissues produced by different border molding materials in edentulous patients: An in vivo study

Arora

Goyal

Sehgal

2015

J Indian Prosthodont Soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim:The aim of the study is to analyze the effect of different materials and techniques in current use on peripheral shaping of complete denture impression.Methods:The present study was conducted to compare and evaluate the maxillary border morphology produced using tissue conditioner as control and low fusing impression compound, Polyether, Pattern resin and periphery wax as border molding materials. The study was carried out on 15 denture wearer patients with well formed, rounded edentulous maxillary arch with adequate width and height. On each patient, border moldings were done, with tissue conditioner which was loaded on the borders of previous maxillary denture of the patient (control group), low fusing impression compound (Group 1), polyether (Group 2), Pattern resin (Group 3) and Peripheral wax (Group 4), respectively on special tray made for the patient. Sulcus width height and area was then measured for each group using stereomicroscope.Results and Conclusions:Based on the study it is concluded that the polyether was the best material for border molding which will give most accurate borders to a denture.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative evaluation of reproducibility of peripheral tissues produced by different border molding materials in edentulous patients: An in vivo study

Arora

Goyal

Sehgal

2015

J Indian Prosthodont Soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These include a high degree of accuracy, dimensional stability, ease of manipulation, and adequate working and setting times. The use of polysulfide,[ 5 ] polyether,[ 4 6 7 ] or vinyl polysiloxane putty[ 8 9 ] impression materials for custom tray border molding has been described. The drawbacks of these materials are odor and staining associated with polysulfide, inadequate manipulation time of polyether, and thick and over extended borders[ 10 ] obtained with putty viscosity of polyvinyl siloxane (PVS).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative evaluation of border molding using two different techniques in maxillary edentulous arches: A clinical study

Qanungo

Aras

Chitre

et al. 2016

J Indian Prosthodont Soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose:The aim of this in vivo study was to compare the single-step border molding technique using injectable heavy viscosity addition silicone with sectional border molding technique using low fusing impression compound by evaluating the retention of heat cure trial denture bases.Materials and Methods:Ten completely edentulous patients in need of prostheses were included in this study. Two border molding techniques, single-step (Group 1) and sectional (Group 2), were compared for retention. Both border molding techniques were performed in each patient. In both techniques, definitive wash impression was made with light viscosity addition silicone. The final results were analyzed using paired t-test to determine whether significant differences existed between the groups.Results:The t-value (3.031) infers that there was a significant difference between Group 1 and Group 2 (P = 0.014). The retention obtained in Group 2 (mean = 9.05 kgf) was significantly higher than that of Group 1 (mean = 8.26 kgf).Conclusion:Sectional border molding technique proved to be more retentive as compared to single-step border molding although clinically the retention appeared comparable.

show abstract

“…Various impression methods were proposed for impression taking for removable denture preparation. [1][2][3][4][5] Of these, border molding using an impression compound has been used for a long time aiming at obtaining a denture border morphology harmonized with perioral muscle movement. [6][7][8] However, no selection criteria or softening conditions of various impression compounds have been specified.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Softening Condition of Impression Compound for Border molding of Removable Dentures

Ueda¹,

Sakurai²,

Kitahara³

et al. 2016

International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: To prepare removable dentures, border molding using an impression compound has been employed for a long time to obtain a denture border morphology harmonized with perioral muscle movement. However, border molding using impression compound is performed following practitioner's empirical rule. The objective of this study is to clarify the optimum softening conditions of impression compound for border molding, for which we measured the pressure assumed to be loaded on impression compound during border molding. Materials and methods:The pressure assumed to be loaded on an impression compound during border molding was measured using a tongue pressure-measuring device. Based on the measured pressure, appropriate softening conditions were investigated (softening temperature and water immersion time) for three types of impression compound: Red (Impression compound Red, Kerr, USA), green (Peri Compound, GC, Japan), and pink (Iso Compound, GC, Japan). Results:The measured pressure was significantly different between those in the oral vestibule in the lower anterior tooth region during tugging the mouth corner, and in the gingivobuccal fold of the lower first molar during large mouth opening. Regarding the impression compound softening condition, red was deformed by all measured muscle pressures after immersion in 60°C water for 30 seconds and 65°C water for 20, 25, and 30 seconds. Green was deformed by all measured muscle pressures after immersion in 60°C water for 30 seconds, and 65°C water for 25 and 30 seconds. In contrast, pink was deformed by all measured muscle pressures after immersion in 55°C water for 25 and 30 seconds. Conclusion:It was clarified that for border molding, muscle pressures of all regions during the functional movements can be registered using red and green softened by immersion in 60°C water for 30 seconds and pink softened by immersion for 20 seconds.

show abstract

Single Stage Silicone Border Molded Closed Mouth Impression Technique—Part II

Cited by 16 publications

References 1 publication

Comparative evaluation of reproducibility of peripheral tissues produced by different border molding materials in edentulous patients: An in vivo study

Comparative evaluation of reproducibility of peripheral tissues produced by different border molding materials in edentulous patients: An in vivo study

Comparative evaluation of border molding using two different techniques in maxillary edentulous arches: A clinical study

Softening Condition of Impression Compound for Border molding of Removable Dentures

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About